There seems to be a bit of confusion regarding the tags and . Despite the fact that the wiki for states that it applies specifically to the Microsoft Fakes framework, many other questions are getting the tag for different implementations of stubbing.

  1. Should the and tags should be folded into the tag?

  2. Should stubs be split into a generic and a child tag?

I originally tried to remove all the questions, but then I saw that had 32 questions. This isn't huge, but I thought it was worth discussing.

  • 7
    stubs seems too generic to dedicate to a Microsoft specific tool. The wiki says that, but that isn't how it's being used. It can be used for a variety of reasons, such as stubs in a mocking framework (like this question). I would get rid of the stubs tag by hand reviewing, either replacing the tag with [microsoft-fakes] or if it isn't related to that framework at all, getting rid of the tag all together (or finding a suitable replacement).
    – vcsjones
    Jun 5, 2013 at 21:08
  • 2
    I fixed the stubs tag wiki.
    – user102937
    Jun 6, 2013 at 3:06


Browse other questions tagged .