I certainly don't mean to rant, so if it sounds that way then I apologize. I'd just like to know what to do, if anything, about the (multiple) editors who approve an edit such as the one found here which:
- claims to have "Improved formatting", when in fact no changes to the code's format were made
- butchers the original grammatical structure of the post
I understand the process for remedying the post itself (i.e. another editor will change it again or revert it), but when a problem like this persists wherein three users -- the original editor and the two approving editors -- accept/approve an edit that is clearly unsatisfactory, to whose attention should this be brought (if anyone's at all)? Or is there an alternative method?
Thanks in advance... You guys rock.