On Stack Overflow, I saw some users editing the same question multiple times, and getting the 2 point reputation bonus for each time.

I saw it during review of a suggested edit (some months ago, I forgot the question that's why I'm unable to paste the link here). I rejected it and gave the reason in the "Other" reason field.

Most of the time I saw that users first formats the code, and then after approval they edit the title and fix the grammar.

Why is this allowed?

My point is, if an user gained 2 reputation points for a particular edit, then why give another 2 points again for the same post? Because the second edit on same question/answer means that there were some mistakes or misses in their previous edit.

  • There are cases like user A suggest edit to fix something; it gets approved then the OP is adding more code or whole section which also need fixing. User A edit again. Maybe feature like "if there was no edit between consecutive suggested edits on the same post, only the first give 2 reputation points when approved". Commented Jun 26, 2013 at 15:28
  • You can review your Revisions if you actually wanted to locate the question.
    – Mark Hurd
    Commented Jun 26, 2013 at 15:46
  • Don't worry; I just noticed how many Revisions you have :-)
    – Mark Hurd
    Commented Jun 26, 2013 at 15:48

2 Answers 2


Maybe this should be changed so that rep gained from editing only applies if the edit was non-consecutive with that user's previous edits on that post.


It's possible to game the system like that, but consider the following case:

  1. OP creates a question with some grammatical errors.
  2. User A edits the question to fix the errors.
  3. OP/User B edits the question to add code/stack traces.
  4. User A edits the question to add code blocks / fix other errors.

User A deserves credit for both edits in this case, so we can't just blanket prevent them from getting additional credit for extra suggested edits on a question.

It's possible there could be a check that says "Are they suggesting an edit to a question where they last edited it (by suggestion)?" but that seems like a really specific use case (and would be up to the staff). I doubt it's worthwhile as the gaming user would get a very limited amount of rep this way.

Note that there is a scaling edit limit based on reputation, so they'd also need some rep already to get any real impact from gaming the system like this.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .