60

Given the ever growing close vote review queue, I think it would help things along if we could streamline the filtering a little more.

At the moment we can filter by tag and by close reason, but off-topic has 7 sub-close-reasons. It may improve the workflow a bit to be able to narrow it down to one or two sub-close-reasons.

enter image description here

There are 41,155 reasons to add this filter. About half of all the CV review queue.
Supporting data provided by Shog:

enter image description here

Improve this question
7
  • 6
    Better yet, can't we just hoist one or two of those items out of the "off-topic" sub-heading? Certain ones don't really seem to fit the natural interpretation of off-topic, but are distinct problems with the state of the question.
    – Cody Gray
    Aug 2, 2013 at 5:47
  • 4
    @CodyGray That's a good point, but I didn't want the filtering idea to get wrapped into another argument/proposal
    – apaul
    Aug 2, 2013 at 5:53
  • I don't disagree (I really dislike the new categories), but this seems to go against the reworking of the flag categories that was recently done.
    – Austin Henley
    Aug 2, 2013 at 5:59
  • I'd be happy if Super User, Server Fault and "belongs on another site" (and "other"?) were all grouped - they're strongly related, unlike the other 3 reasons.
    – Bernhard Barker
    Oct 4, 2013 at 9:47
  • 3
    there are 61,745 reasons to add this filter. 2/3 of all the CV review queue, apparently extremely diverse issues, are presented to reviewers as an unsorted pile - even to those aware about how filtering works. No wonder that reviews get stuck
    – gnat
    Nov 30, 2013 at 10:28
  • 1
    @gnat thanks for the clarification
    – apaul
    Nov 30, 2013 at 15:57
  • 1
    See also Can we have a “recommendation and off-site resource” filter for the Close Review Queue? on MSO.
    – user163250
    Aug 4, 2014 at 16:31

2 Answers 2

Reset to default
28
+100

I do like the idea.

For example I'd review general off-topic, custom off-topic, and belongs to other site but I don't like reviewing "please post SSCCE" and "minimal understanding" reasons.

Note, that it may help reduce the close votes review queue because it may attract some people to review things they want to (like me, for example)

Improve this answer
1
  • 2
    love the point that each person can choose their type
    – Dave Alperovich
    Dec 22, 2013 at 20:49
6

This kind of filtering would make a huge difference.

The worst kind of questions, and easiest to review (least time invested), are the infamous

must demonstrate minimal understanding.

They represent the "do my homework", "I haven't done any personal research", etc types. They are most deserving of being removed and least difficult to identify.

If I could filter by those, I could knock out 40 quickly, efficiently, and without being sloppy.

Improve this answer
3
  • 2
    Not as easy as recommended a tool, library or off site resource, could do those in my sleep
    – Richard Tingle
    Dec 22, 2013 at 21:32
  • 1
    Really suspicious this post is just encouraging people to review a certain filtered type of post like popcorn and get sloppy.
    – djechlin
    Mar 23, 2014 at 14:00
  • 3
    Really suspicious??? As in conspiring to cause harm suspiscious??? Are you arguing that these kinds of questions are not more obvious than others? Are you arguing that there is no merit to distinguishing between obvious, and blatant Q's that need closing and are easier to identify? Or are you arguing that I'm conspiring to cause sloppy reviews? I don't see you addressing what I've said, @djechlin. What I see is you sniping and down-voting me, as usual.
    – Dave Alperovich
    Mar 23, 2014 at 17:43

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .