Since my one deleted and two moderately downvoted questions on meta have got me banned (automatically - there's your secret formula!) from asking more questions - on meta! - and have branded my "contribution" "low quality", I don't want to burden this site with my low quality contributions anymore. I would expect freedom of discussion to be a cherished value of any "community" I were to belong to. The community where expressing an unpopular opinion automatically bans a person from being able to even ask a question - on meta! - is not something I want to be a part of. I will not be forced into silence, and I won't accept being forced into silence. To which I can't object because I'm banned from speaking. On meta no less. Which should be an open place for free discussion.
That's some rotten stuff, I tell you. This is weak.
(go ahead, delete this, an deny me this last refuge of free speech. yeah yeah, "this is not an answer" but I can't well post a question now can I).
...first they explain to you that on meta, the downvotes don't mean that you asked a bad question, just that people were disagreeing with you. "don't take it to heart" on meta, they say to you, "it's not a judgement on your posts".
then after just two good-faith questions with moderate amount of downvotes (and one deleted question in the distant past, which is a story in itself) you are suddenly banned from asking new questions, for posting "low quality content", asking "bad questions", and are suggested to "read your questions to yourself aloud to see how they really are seen by others".
shikes. that's not the rules I was promised to be playing by. Not what I was promised, at all.
banning people from speaking, making them be afraid to freely express a legitimate opinion or even ask for suggestions in fear that this might be considered controversial and they will be banned for it...
double minus ungood. (yes, I am alluding to the Orwellian nature of this policy - on meta!).