The tag on Stack Overflow has no tag wiki, no summary, and is ambiguous as to what it does.

Referring to Jeff's Criteria on Meta-Tags

If the tag can’t work as the only tag on a question, it’s probably a meta-tag

By itself doesn't tell me anything useful about the question. A question tagged as Linked would need additional tags to give it any useful context.

If the tag commonly means different things to different people, it’s probably a meta-tag

This is where the biggest issue with this tag is; it is ambiguous as to what "linked" it is referring to. Looking at the tag it is heavily used by questions which refer to which has its own tag, but has also been used on other questions including linked objects, linking in HTML, LinkedIn, and other uses.

At the moment this tag is ambiguous and subjective in its usage and should either be burninated or synonymized with and removed from the questions which do not concern linked lists.


closed as off-topic by Undo, Martijn Pieters, 3ventic, random, mhlester May 13 '14 at 21:12

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – Undo, Martijn Pieters, 3ventic, random, mhlester
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.