3

I am unsure about when to use the [tag:tag] syntax when asking or answering a question.

I am not talking about the (up to five) s you tag the question with, but those you can put in the text.

Example: Someone asks a question how to do something in and post a some code he/she came up with using and tags this question and . I answer this question using since a solution was not requeseted. Then I would write somthing like "I think would be better suited for this problem than . Try this: ..." [please do not comment on vs. here, it's just an example ;-)] This way I draw the attention of the community to the question potentially helping the OP (and the community as a whole) getting the best answer.

I like this approach a lot and tend to use s extensively throughout my questions and answers. Recently one of my questions got edited removing most of the s.

I think this was because it reduced readability and using each once (either in the text or as one of the question's s) would be sufficent to reach the corresponding sub-community.

But were to draw the line?

  • When do you use s in questions or answers?
  • How do you handle such overed texts like this one?
  • Do you think the number of s should be limited (overall limit / each tag only once)?
  • Or is the need to type [tag:tag] over and over again in general enough to keep users from using (no pun intended) this feature too much and I am the only one even thinking about this?

Please note that

  • I was just considering "big" s with several thousand followers and
  • this question was ment to be an extreme example (is it?)
9

Never ever ever...ever. Well, unless you particularly wish/need to link to the tag wiki perhaps, or you're discussing a tag related issue on Meta. If you want to link to a tag wiki, a direct link there might even be preferred. And if you still want to use the actual tag formatting, don't use it more than once.

If you hover over a tag, you'll see the text:

show questions tagged 'tagname'

That pretty much explains the purpose for that bit of formatting. It's a way to lead users to similarly tagged content. If you just want to say you're doing something with bash, then just say it. There is no need to format that as a tag. There is no reason why you would want to lead users to other questions with that tag.

Not even in your awk example. If you want to point the user at the great tag wiki content for awk, just to get him started, then link to https://stackoverflow.com/tags/awk/info. As for drawing the attention of the awk community, I don't see how including the tag in the body of your post would do that.

Just because you can format something, that doesn't mean you should. Use it sparingly and only when really needed.

  • 1
    I spotted this yesterday. I think I'm going to go ahead and roll back that edit that changed "CSS" to the tag syntax for whatever reason. – BoltClock's a Unicorn Aug 30 '13 at 9:40
  • Yeah @BoltClock'saUnicorn, don't see the point of it in that case. "Just because I can" is not a sufficient reason for me to use the tag formatting. – Bart Aug 30 '13 at 9:44
  • Btw @BoltClock'saUnicorn, in that particular case you seem to have undone another edit (-moz-none;). That's what you intended? – Bart Aug 30 '13 at 9:51
  • I was going to edit it in but it looks like I forgot to actually submit the edit. – BoltClock's a Unicorn Aug 30 '13 at 10:15
  • Could you explain a little bit more why not and where new users should find out about that? – mschilli Aug 30 '13 at 10:37
  • @sg-lecram Done and "in the answer above" ;) – Bart Aug 30 '13 at 12:08
  • 1
    Likewise: I feel there's no need to link to Wikipedia or similar resources for very common terminology. Especially on mobile browsers, where most devices do not support hover, it annoys me big time I cannot trust a link to reveal something useful. – Arjan Aug 30 '13 at 12:15
  • 1
    Ah yes @Arjan, that reminds me of sites that think it's helpful to automatically link random words in a text to an off-site resource. It makes me want to punch kittens. And you don't want me to punch a kitten, now do you? – Bart Aug 30 '13 at 12:18
  • Well, @Bart, to put things into perspective: I'd rather have you punch a kitten than have you abuse linking! ;-) – Arjan Aug 30 '13 at 12:22

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .