1

I found some good advice on handling dead links and one of the pieces of advice is to fix the link if possible.

In the situation where the link is dead and I can correct the link, can I strikethrough the original and give the corrected eg <del> or http//news.com.au instead?

I figure it shows that the link has changed, should anyone wonder about the original site.


Edit: Example of where I have tried to do this: https://stackoverflow.com/review/suggested-edits/2911883. In this situation the original blog is no longer live, and the author uses a new address.

6

No. leave a comment pointing out the link is dead and/or replace it with a valid one. Striking it out won't do anything except confuse the user, you'd have to leave an additional remark that the link is dead, which makes striking it out unnecessary.

Another approach would be to check if the answer can live without the link, if no, you could try to acquire the information from the web-archive and copy it into the answer, noting that the link is dead but leaving it there (for attribution and information purposes). If there's no way to retrieve the information from that link and the answer is not helpful without it, then the answer should most likely be deleted.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .