13

I failed this reopen review:
https://stackoverflow.com/review/reopen/2941248

I clicked "reopen" and apparently I should have left the question closed.

I do not understand why: The question was closed because it was not phrased clearly, it underwent extensive editing by the OP. I believe that in its current, edited, version it is a clear question now and should be given a second chance.

Can you please tell me why I am wrong here?
Why should this question be left closed even after OP's edit?
Is it such a clear-cut case that it should become an audit item?

closed as off-topic by Sonic the Reinstate Monica-hog, rene, Glorfindel, Robert Longson, Donald Duck Jul 28 '18 at 23:39

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question's topic is only applicable to one specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should relate to features or policies that commonly apply to the network or the software that drives it, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – Sonic the Reinstate Monica-hog, rene, Glorfindel, Robert Longson, Donald Duck
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 1
    Yes, the question was revised by the OP, but it was still deleted. Audits are meant so that you would check the actual question pages. – hjpotter92 Sep 17 '13 at 5:21
  • 6
    @hjpotter92 - I looked at the question itself, at its two versions, before and after the edit. I agree that even after the edit it will not be nominated for "question of the year" award, but I do believe its closing reason "unclear what you are asking" is no longer valid and therefore needs to be reopend. – Shai Sep 17 '13 at 5:26
  • 5
    so questions that are closed, then edited, then deleted now may become reopen audits? Now excuse me for a while, I'm going to poison the honey in the honeypot. – John Dvorak Sep 17 '13 at 5:42
  • Who audit the audits? Are posts becoming "audits" automatically? – Shai Sep 17 '13 at 5:44
  • 8
    @Shai yes, they are, but this criterion is plain wrong. – John Dvorak Sep 17 '13 at 5:46
  • 2
    edited question may be right on the way for undeletion and reopening; as long as system can not reliably determine whether this is the case or not (and it looks like it can't), picking it for audits is a design mistake – gnat Sep 17 '13 at 8:53
  • 1
    Yeah, that's not a very good question. It's basically "troubleshoot my code for me" without any clear explanation of what the code is supposed to do. – Robert Harvey Sep 17 '13 at 15:29