13

While looking at a close review item, this looked rather weird:

So I took a look at it on the question, and it didn't look the same:

Here's the edit page:

Is this a bug?

Improve this question
6
  • 4
    That looks like something's thrown MathJax into the review page.
    – michaelb958--GoFundMonica
    Nov 3, 2013 at 0:33
  • Can you link to the review? Also, do you have any LaTeX-rendering plugins?
    – user206222
    Nov 3, 2013 at 0:41
  • Hmm, no-repro now, sucks. stackoverflow.com/review/close/3201006
    – Qantas 94 Heavy
    Nov 3, 2013 at 0:42
  • 2
    LaTeX broke the suspension tool for a bit, too. :D
    – Ry-
    Nov 3, 2013 at 1:42
  • @minitech: you mods really enjoy stamping on littluns, don't you?
    – Qantas 94 Heavy
    Nov 3, 2013 at 4:04
  • 2
    @Anna nice tag but make it mod-only so it won't get removed by mistake. ;)
    – Shadow Wizard Says No More War
    Nov 3, 2013 at 8:28

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
16

Nick Craver was testing MathJax performance for an answer to a request for MathJax to be enabled on Stack Overflow. It looks like you stumbled into an edit that inadvertently triggered MathJax to typeset an equation.

Improve this answer
3
  • 16
    Oops...sorry :(
    – Nick Craver
    Nov 3, 2013 at 1:53
  • @Nick so how is the performance? :)
    – Shadow Wizard Says No More War
    Nov 3, 2013 at 8:29
  • 1
    But Nick wrote even when "it's not doing anything" ;-)
    – Arjan
    Nov 3, 2013 at 9:11

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .