1

I've seen some questions about CDN, how to use it, how to build it, or even suggesting best practices for CDN's URL patterns.

Examples are:

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/20101814/best-practice-for-url-pattern-to-use-in-cdn-and-its-contents
CDN and URL's with query-strings
What are CDN Best Practices?

Are they on-topic here? If not, to which other StackExchange site should we guide users?

5
  • 2
    Two of them are very old. All three questions are fairly different from each other. The new one may or may not be a viable question, but it's not terrible. One has the dreaded "best practices" in the title, but I feel kind of "meh" about all this. Is there a specific reason for your interest in these questions?
    – Pekka
    Commented Nov 21, 2013 at 5:24
  • @probablyPekka, thanks for your feedback. Yeah, I have a special reason for this, because the fellow how has asked this question is a colleague of mine, and we do have a problem deciding a good pattern for URLs. I thought "after all, it's a development question, and it's too technical to be asked on programmers. Also, it's not subjective, so it could have a definite answer". So I encouraged him to ask it on SO. But somebody has voted to close. That's why I asked this question. Commented Nov 21, 2013 at 5:35
  • I see. The votes aren't there because of the topic of CDNs, though - they're because 2 people think question is "primarily opinion-based". Which arguably is true. That said, what do you need a URL pattern for in the first place? I'm lost as to why someone would need that. Why break up packages that make logical sense, and file them by MIME type?
    – Pekka
    Commented Nov 21, 2013 at 5:41
  • Oh, we didn't mean to make it opinion-based. But, what if we don't do that in URL? can we simply go like http://cdn/jquery.js? Because it's usually a static resource, we want IIS to deliver it. Thus it's important that we have a good file-system architecture, because URL path maps directly to physical path on the hard. Commented Nov 21, 2013 at 10:11
  • Well, any answer is going to be opinion based, as this is an architectural choice. You could take a look at how other sites do it, e.g. Stack Overflow: they separate by site name and resource type (/stackoverflow/img/xyz). Other sites just use http://cdn/323131423423423.css.
    – Pekka
    Commented Nov 21, 2013 at 14:09

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .