Right now the flagging history stats are kind of lumped together visually. I'd like to suggest an easy to implement enhancement that would make reading the flagging history stats easier.

By adding some basic visual cues like borders, and placing the percentage statistic after the particular flag type, your history becomes much easier to read at a glance.

enter image description here

  • 13
    If we're on the subject of clarifying the stats, can we drop the "deemed" from "deemed helpful" and change the "waiting for review" to "active" as well? – animuson Nov 26 '13 at 21:32
  • 1
    Huh. Looking at the declined/disputed rates; it kinda makes me wonder if I'm just overly cautious about my flags. – Dennis Meng Nov 26 '13 at 21:35
  • 1
    @Dennis When it comes to flags, a little bit of declined flagging is preferable if more bad questions are captured in the net. – user206222 Nov 26 '13 at 21:38
  • 1
    Just wondering. I'm at 195 helpful to 2 declined right now. – Dennis Meng Nov 26 '13 at 21:53
  • 2
    @animuson BTW "deemed" has disappeared with this fix. – Taryn Oct 20 '15 at 16:46

Oded was nice enough to implement this in the latest build. We don't have percentages, but we've added an indicator/underline for each category. The history now looks like:

enter image description here

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    It also includes flags that were aged away (mine being quite a high number, too). – Jamal Oct 20 '15 at 16:07
  • @Jamal Yes, it sure does - I'm going through a lot of posts to complete them, including this one. – Taryn Oct 20 '15 at 16:08
  • 1
    Cool, thanks @Oded. I'll keep my fingers crossed for the percentages. – j08691 Oct 20 '15 at 16:25
  • 1
    @j08691 Still interested in seeing the percentages? I wrote a userscript for it.. – matt. Jan 24 '16 at 19:55

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .