Right now the flagging history stats are kind of lumped together visually. I'd like to suggest an easy to implement enhancement that would make reading the flagging history stats easier.

By adding some basic visual cues like borders, and placing the percentage statistic after the particular flag type, your history becomes much easier to read at a glance.

enter image description here

  • 13
    If we're on the subject of clarifying the stats, can we drop the "deemed" from "deemed helpful" and change the "waiting for review" to "active" as well?
    – animuson StaffMod
    Nov 26, 2013 at 21:32
  • 1
    Huh. Looking at the declined/disputed rates; it kinda makes me wonder if I'm just overly cautious about my flags. Nov 26, 2013 at 21:35
  • 1
    @Dennis When it comes to flags, a little bit of declined flagging is preferable if more bad questions are captured in the net.
    – user206222
    Nov 26, 2013 at 21:38
  • 1
    Just wondering. I'm at 195 helpful to 2 declined right now. Nov 26, 2013 at 21:53
  • 2
    @animuson BTW "deemed" has disappeared with this fix.
    – Taryn
    Oct 20, 2015 at 16:46

1 Answer 1


Oded was nice enough to implement this in the latest build. We don't have percentages, but we've added an indicator/underline for each category. The history now looks like:

enter image description here

  • 1
    It also includes flags that were aged away (mine being quite a high number, too).
    – Jamal
    Oct 20, 2015 at 16:07
  • @Jamal Yes, it sure does - I'm going through a lot of posts to complete them, including this one.
    – Taryn
    Oct 20, 2015 at 16:08
  • 1
    Cool, thanks @Oded. I'll keep my fingers crossed for the percentages.
    – j08691
    Oct 20, 2015 at 16:25
  • 1
    @j08691 Still interested in seeing the percentages? I wrote a userscript for it..
    – matt.
    Jan 24, 2016 at 19:55

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .