18

I'm getting this error in Firebug:

TypeError: l is undefined https://meta.stackoverflow.com/content/Js/full.en.js?v=29537078da9e Line 45

The icons in the top bar aren't clickable and I don't get tag suggestions.

Reproducible on Firefox, Chrome and IE (all latest).

  • 12
    I finally can post a witty comment about how JavaScript is broken as designed! (I still want my money back) – Cat Plus Plus Dec 3 '13 at 10:41
  • We almost had a risk of the most answered question ever on meta, glad it was fixed. phew close call – Nobody Dec 3 '13 at 10:43
  • 5
    btw maybe it's time to think about some graceful degradation – Cat Plus Plus Dec 3 '13 at 10:43
  • 5
    for the record: not localization – Sklivvz Dec 3 '13 at 10:45
  • 2
    @Mołot magical unicorn just saved your precious answer! ;) – Shadow The Princess Wizard Dec 3 '13 at 10:53
  • @Sklivvz I think it was. – michaelb958--Reinstate Monica Dec 3 '13 at 10:54
  • Thank you, thank you mysterious Magical Unicorn ;) (and @ShaWizDowArd for telling me) – Mołot Dec 3 '13 at 10:54
  • @michaelb958 that has an 's' in it. Not genuine. – Sklivvz Dec 3 '13 at 10:58
  • 1
    @Sklivvz Oh, rats... – michaelb958--Reinstate Monica Dec 3 '13 at 10:59
  • @ShaWizDowArd That's not an Eeeek. See meta.stackexchange.com/a/83625/115866. – balpha Dec 3 '13 at 11:46
  • @balpha I disagree, the site was totally broken... as far as I can tell, Eeeeek wasn't just for envelope but to any change/bug that is overwhelming enough. Oh well.! – Shadow The Princess Wizard Dec 3 '13 at 11:51
  • 1
    @ShaWizDowArd An Eeeek! post is a "Who moved my cheese" complaint about a deliberate change we made with which the poster disagrees. I can assure you we did not deliberately break Meta's JavaScript :) – balpha Dec 3 '13 at 11:54
  • @balpha oh, missed the "deliberate" part. All good now! – Shadow The Princess Wizard Dec 3 '13 at 11:54
  • @balpha wait... so when the top bar will be replaced network wide, won't it be like Eeeeeeeek? LOTS of stuff are going to be missing all of a sudden and most likely many people won't really love it. – Shadow The Princess Wizard Dec 3 '13 at 11:55
  • 2
    @ShaWizDowArd Yes, that's a classical Eeeek. – balpha Dec 3 '13 at 11:56
18

Being fixed as we speak; should be back to working in a few minutes.

15

Would convert Mołot's answer to a comment, but I can't as JavaScript is broken on meta.

Would comment to that effect, but I can't for the same reason that he can't either.

But if JavaScript wasn't broken, this question wouldn't have existed in the first place.

Why am I still here?

7

Would upvote and comment to say I have the same issue. But I can't as JavaScript is broken on meta...

7

Yippie! I'd upvote if I could, but I confirmed the issue:

Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property 'klass' of undefined

in https://meta.stackoverflow.com/content/Js/full.en.js

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .