22

This question already has an answer here:

I was just reviewing suggested edits, and I rejected this edit.

Does anyone have an explanation as to why this edit was rejected with only one vote? Usually it requires 3 votes unless the author rejects it. This wasn't the case, as I'm not the author.

There haven't been any other edits on the post since December 5.

Rejected img

Perhaps the number of rejects required has been lowered for editors with a bad accept to reject ratio? Since that isn't very likely, I assume this is a bug.

marked as duplicate by Shog9 Dec 29 '13 at 20:27

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • 3
    Perhaps the number of rejects required has been lowered for editors with a bad accept to reject ratio? If only. Alas, I'm rather confident that's not the case here. – Servy Dec 23 '13 at 19:19
  • 10
    You didn't by chance happen to have been a mod 2 hours ago and had your superpowers since removed? – Servy Dec 23 '13 at 19:20
  • Can the original editor choose to revert during that time? – Joe Dec 23 '13 at 19:23
  • 3
    @Servy "@JoshC Invisible sneaky mods?" chat.meta.stackoverflow.com/transcript/message/1700319#1700319 – hichris123 Dec 23 '13 at 19:23
  • 7
    It's a Christmas miracle! – Jamal Dec 23 '13 at 19:26
  • 1
    Most of the time when we have things like this, it's because someone went in and edited after the user (and then @Community rejects it). Doesn't seem to be the case here, but maybe invisibly so? – Joe Dec 23 '13 at 19:28
  • 1
    Yeah, but there are no other edits on that answer, @Joe (other than one from 12/5). – Josh Darnell Dec 23 '13 at 19:30
  • 10
    We should note that your reject vote was 7 seconds before the edit was officially marked as rejected. So your vote didn't directly cause the rejection, but something certainly happened to cause it. – animuson Dec 23 '13 at 19:38
  • @jadarnel27 Hence, 'invisibly so'. :) – Joe Dec 23 '13 at 19:39
  • @animuson How long until this is visible on Data explorer and non-staff can investigate? :) – Joe Dec 23 '13 at 19:40
  • (answers own question) It's updated every Monday morning, so sadly we need to wait a week to find out... and I'm guessing 12/30 isn't a day a lot of us are going to be thinking about that ;) (Or, are we?) – Joe Dec 23 '13 at 19:58
  • It wouldn't surprise me if suggested edits on old, accepted answers requires unanimous approval by reviewers. – Robert Harvey Dec 23 '13 at 22:32
  • Could this come from a moderator right/privileges? They can already close question without voting. – user2284570 Dec 28 '13 at 22:57
  • @user2284570 no, the moderator would be listed in such case. – Shadow Wizard Dec 29 '13 at 10:08
2

Note that this guy attempted to edit the same post 6 times (gotta appreciate the dedication..), I'm only guessing here but this might have triggered some auto tool that retracted his edit privileges. This would also explain animusons' comment about the timing.

Edit: I see that the last reject was by the author himself, maybe that prevents further edits? If anyone (without instant edit privileges) is interested - try to edit this answer and i'll reject, then try again :)

  • Nope, according to the formula, (5 - (1 /3)) = 5 - 0.33 = 4.67 so he's not yet banned. +1 for spotting this though! EDIT: disregard formula, the first 5 suggestions are older than a week so don't count. – Shadow Wizard Dec 25 '13 at 22:48
  • @ShadowWizard, thanks for the link! Could there be some extra weight to rejects by the author of the post? – Leeor Dec 25 '13 at 22:50
  • @Leeor don't think so, it's just a binding vote. Checking other lead now... – Shadow Wizard Dec 25 '13 at 22:52
  • Dead end... found more of this kind using this query (e.g. stackoverflow.com/users/2250116/user2250116?tab=activity) but none show this weird reject behaviour. – Shadow Wizard Dec 25 '13 at 23:03

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .