I'm looking for policy or guidance on the following situation. Someone just posted a new question Q1. I noticed that one of the existing answers to another question (Q2) already answers Q1 -- the answer to Q2 happens to be general enough that it answers not just Q2 but also Q1. However, Q1 is not the same question as Q2: they are somewhat related, but they're definitely different questions. In particular, not every good answer to Q2 would answer Q1.

What should I do in this situation? Should I mark Q1 as a duplicate of Q2? Should I avoid marking it as a duplicate? Is it a judgement call? Is there any general policy or guideline?

Where I looked for information on this

The closest related question I could find on MSO was At what point does a question become a duplicate?. There, Shog writes "If a new question is answered by the answers to an old question, I will generally consider it a duplicate. The exception to this is when an answer to the new one does, or potentially could add a significant amount of useful information." So that makes me think it is often OK to mark Q1 as a duplicate of Q2, but not always.

The official guidance says to close a question as a duplicate when it is "sufficiently similar to existing questions and would be answered identically to them", which makes it sound pretty simple: do not mark Q1 as a duplicate of Q2.

If it's relevant, when a question is closed as a duplicate, it is marked with the label "This question already has an answer here:". I suppose this could be taken to suggest that it's OK to mark Q1 as a duplicate of Q2, though personally I doubt that we should be looking to that wording for guidance or policy about duplicates.

I've read Close reason proposal: "Answer exists elsewhere", but that sounds like a different situation to me, so I'm not sure whether the discussion there is applicable. (For those who read Grace Note's answer there: For instance, the mkdir example is not quite the same situation, because those were two unrelated questions, and the hypothesized answer is not likely to be a good answer to both questions.) I've also read Should we answer questions if the answers can be found elsewhere on the site?, but I'm not 100% clear on how that applies to the situation I gave above.

If you want to see the specific situation where I ran into this most recently, it is this question: Decide whether a DFA accepts the empty language. But I most interested in the general policy/guidance for what to do in this situation, as I see this sort of situation from time to time.

  • Why aren't any answers accepted yet?
    – Ky -
    Commented Jul 29, 2015 at 15:29
  • 1
    @BenC.R.Leggiero, because I'm not sure I should be choosing one in this particular case -- it's a policy decision, and my main goal was to see what policy the community supports/encourages, rather than for me to try to push a particular policy.
    – D.W.
    Commented Jul 29, 2015 at 16:19

2 Answers 2


If the questions are different, they shouldn't be marked as duplicates.

The solution here is to comment (or post an answer) with a link to Q2's more-general answer. If you choose to post an answer, it ought to include some of the general answer's content as well (not merely a link). Note that this answer may not solve Q1's problem exactly, but it provides some food for thought.

Q2's general answer then shows up where it otherwise might not be seen, allowing:

  1. Q1's viewers some insight into a related question's discussion
  2. Q1 to receive answers tailored to Q1. If marked as a duplicate, Q1 loses potential good answers, since "not every good answer to Q2 would answer Q1."
  • 1
    I disagree. It is a gray line. Officially the guideline is if the question has an answer elsewhere, so theoretically if the answers address both questions they are dups, even if the questions are different. But in cases where only 1 answer address both questions but other answers don't, I don't think they are dups. Commented Dec 27, 2013 at 23:44
  • @psubsee2003 Perhaps a gray line is correct. However, in the case where two questions' answers overlap, I don't see a reason to consider the questions duplicates. Merging them, you'd lose some good content, but I believe it's important to have some link between them.
    – Trojan
    Commented Dec 27, 2013 at 23:49
  • Merging <> duplicate. Merging is a special case of duplication that only mods can do and is general reserved for cases where you have EXACT duplicates with good answers on both. Regular Duplicates are just points to the other question Commented Dec 27, 2013 at 23:52

In general, questions should be closed based on being a duplicate of another question. However, in the cases of proper subsets, it's ok to close a question as a duplicate of a more general question if the answer to the general would answer the specific. You really have to decide on a case-by-case basis on these.

An example where it doesn't work well is something we see a lot of on Meta, where a specific tagging question is asked and attempted to be closed of a generic tagging question, but the specific one has to have a specific answer, like burninate or not burninate.

  • 1
    Thanks. This is helpful. So this sounds like: if Q2 is a more general-version of Q1 (Q1 is just a special case of Q2), it can be OK to close Q1 as a duplicate of the more-general question -- but one has to look at the details to see if it really makes sense or not. Cool, that's a helpful, concrete, and actionable criterion. I appreciate it!
    – D.W.
    Commented Dec 27, 2013 at 23:46

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .