There is nothing wrong with rejecting the edit, and it should have been rejected had the reviewers not been asleep at the queue.
It is a Bad Edit
The following issues are clearly visible from the suggested edit review:
- It has a giant EDIT: in it
- It has two contradicting answers
- It says 'now' without indicating how to distinguish
At the very least, the edit should be improved before being accepted. Accepting as is creates an unclear answer ("Which answer is right, and how do I tell which is right for me?"). Improving it should include taking a look at the question and other answers to make sure that you are improving the signal of the site. And if you do that you will find...
The Content is Already Available on that Answer
If you look at the actual question, there is this comment posted over a year ago with more upvotes than the answer:
That's deprecated now. Use the BitmapDrawable(Resources, Bitmap) constructor now.
The Content is Already Available in Another Answer
The accepted answer to the question already covers the same topic as well:
Sounds like you want to use BitmapDrawable
From the documentation:
Drawable that wraps a bitmap and can
be tiled, stretched, or aligned. You
can create a
BitmapDrawable from a
file path, an input stream, through
XML inflation, or from a
Since anyone looking at the question will already find the information they are looking for 'above the fold', there is no reason to edit the lowest voted answer that is incorrect. The appropriate behavior would be to reject the edit, upvote the accepted answer, and downvote the incorrect answer.
And all is well with the world.