This seems too broad and/or off topic (for finding a tool). https://stackoverflow.com/review/close/4118533 So I clicked close, but I got this :
Am I right that this question should be closed? Or if I'm wrong, why is this question acceptable?
Meta Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for meta-discussion of the Stack Exchange family of Q&A websites. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this communityThis seems too broad and/or off topic (for finding a tool). https://stackoverflow.com/review/close/4118533 So I clicked close, but I got this :
Am I right that this question should be closed? Or if I'm wrong, why is this question acceptable?
You're right, that question should be closed. It's not clear what it's asking for, but if it's not asking for a library recommendation, it should be closed anyway for just being unclear.
I encounter such reviews sometimes, too. This is one of the rare cases where the audit system selects a post as audit because it doesn't match any of the system's close criteria.
Shog has posted some requirements for audits used in the reopen queue. I assume that this requirements fit for audits that expect the user to click Leave Opened as well.
I don't worry about such review fails. I just open the question itself and vote to close. That ensures that this question will never be used as a review again: So one failed audit on my record, but problem solved for all other users.
This question is short, but on topic. Your close vote is incorrect.
It
While general recommendations for "a tool, library or favorite off-site resource" are off-topic, this question is not asking "what's your favorite Node.js MP3 splitter?" - it's just asking for any solution to a specific problem.
Additionally:
That said, it could be improved by editing. I'd:
But demonstrating prior failed attempts is nice-to-have, not need-to-have.
Because the question is salvageable through minor editing, and focused enough to have a good answer that's helpful to others in the future, it shouldn't be closed.