This question already has an answer here:

This edit was approved: https://stackoverflow.com/review/suggested-edits/4179699. However, bolding a few occurences of "github" and "SELinux", and changing "I have to" to "I've to" seems like a very poor edit indeed. The editor has had 131 edit suggestions approved, and 56 edit suggestions rejected, and it seems to me a good number of those approved should probably have been rejected ( this one, for example )

I could roll this edit back, but I don't know if the edit review link will still work at this point, and I'm not yet sure of the guidelines around that.

My question is this: Is it possible to flag individual reviews for attention so that our bored and underworked moderators can send the reviewers a helpful message about editing, and possibly give them a temporary break from suggested edit reviews?

Of course, I'm new to hitting the suggested edit reviews (I generally stay in the close vote list) - I may be wrong about the validity of the edit. If that's the case please let me know in no uncertain terms.

marked as duplicate by Martijn Pieters, Danubian Sailor, Robert Harvey Feb 27 '14 at 18:01

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • 1
    I agree, this edit is a nonsense. – BartoszKP Feb 27 '14 at 15:52
  • 7
    "I've to"... I don't think I have ever seen or heard someone use that phrase, ever. They must have been short 2 characters for the minimum acceptable edit. The person suggesting the edit should also get a temporary break. – Johnny Bones Feb 27 '14 at 15:57
  • The same guy has made a lot of changes like that today. I managed to reject a handful of them but most of them got approved quickly :-( – Rup Feb 27 '14 at 16:51
  • 1
    This edit review would not have been approved, if we had a tennis rule in place. – Robert Harvey Feb 27 '14 at 18:00
  • 100% agree. Sorry I didn't find the duplicate, but it also led me to meta.stackexchange.com/questions/155561/… , which is possibly a better choice to send people to from this question. – Philip Rieck Feb 27 '14 at 19:06

Browse other questions tagged .