I have just failed a review audit and was told that this question did not have any problem. To my understanding of the SO asking rules, that question is not actually on an implementation problem, but about a call for discussion about a comment on another question, deserving to me a "too broad" or a "opinion based" closing vote.
Would you mind explain in what that question is legit on SO?
If not, maybe that the "I understand" button of the review audit could be augmented with a "I do not agree"? I guess that it could add some more unwanted discussion...
[asm]tags when I was proposed that review that was falsely tagged
[asm](i checked that the tag was not removed), that makes another question on the review audit. (I do not contest the usefulness of the review audit to test reviewers BTW)