8

This question already has an answer here:

I'm looking at the revision history for this question, which was closed as off-topic a few days ago. Just a few minutes ago, the OP radically revised it; it doesn't even resemble the original question anymore. In fact, the two versions only share about seven words and some punctuation. Here's a screenshot of the most recent revision:

enter image description here

So, the question for the community is this: Is this proper, or should it be rolled back?

Edit: I went ahead and rolled it back because it has a couple of answers already (responding to the old version). But I would still like to know the community consensus on this.

marked as duplicate by Josh Caswell, Martijn Pieters, ale, michaelb958--Reinstate Monica, Josh Crozier Mar 17 '14 at 0:47

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • 8
    50 rep says the user is question banned. – Mysticial Mar 16 '14 at 22:23
  • 2
    roll back. ${}$ – John Dvorak Mar 16 '14 at 22:24
  • @Mysticial That seems likely, but I'm not at 10k yet, so I can't see. – elixenide Mar 16 '14 at 22:24
  • 2
    If the question has answers; roll back. If not; meh – Richard Tingle Mar 16 '14 at 22:24
  • 1
    @Ed 10kers can't see Q-bans either. Thats mod only – Richard Tingle Mar 16 '14 at 22:25
  • wait, does he really think this will get reopened and answered? – John Dvorak Mar 16 '14 at 22:25
  • @RichardTingle Ah, good to know. – elixenide Mar 16 '14 at 22:25
  • Rolled back now. – John Dvorak Mar 16 '14 at 22:26
  • 1
    Related: What to do with questions that had their content erased? (I think that removal of the original question counts as erasure of content.) – michaelb958--Reinstate Monica Mar 16 '14 at 22:28
  • If you get involved in a rollback war with the original poster, then flag for moderator action (although I believe that several successive rollbacks automatically trigger the mods), and they may lock the question if they see fit to do so. – Hovercraft Full Of Eels Mar 16 '14 at 22:56
  • 1
    @Mysticial Just looked at the OP's rep. 100% of OP's activity until the last hour was on March 12: 3 questions, 2 of which got closed, and which collectively have a total of 12 downvotes so far. So, yeah, question-ban seems pretty likely. – elixenide Mar 16 '14 at 23:01
  • 1
    It has also happened to this question. – Peter Mortensen Mar 16 '14 at 23:23
  • 1
    @PeterMortensen Yep, same user, same (new) question. Sigh... – elixenide Mar 16 '14 at 23:42
  • 4
    Yup, they were blocked from asking new questions two hours ago, at which point they decided to work around this by replacing one of their existing questions with this. If there are answers targeting the original question, don't hesitate to roll it back. – Brad Larson Mar 17 '14 at 0:06
11

A general rule I follow is "is this action harming the community or the internet in general".

If there are answers then the question is undoubtedly yes. It harms the community because it destroys other people's work and it harms the internet because good answers are effectively removed (or no longer make sense). Roll these back with deadly force.

If this decends into a rollback war then flag for moderator attention using "other"

If there are no answers currently then it doesn't really matter, no one else's answers are invalidated so; meh, not ideal but nothing really wrong with it.

  • Accepted because (1) this matches my own thinking perfectly, (2) it was pretty quick, and (3) it represents the consensus that was forming in the comments. Thanks. – elixenide Mar 16 '14 at 22:48

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .