7

Please see "Pay it forward" in "How to Answer".

Point of concern:

Instead, **vote up** the answers

I noted that the double asterisks seem a bit out of place. Was this meant to be some sort of emphasis, in which case it should be either italicized or bolded?

  • 2
    Oh Markdown, sometimes we wonder about you... (**text** is meant to be emphasised as bold text.) – michaelb958--GoFundMonica Mar 20 '14 at 23:19
  • 2
    Well, it used to support markdown: web.archive.org/web/20120122184111/http://stackoverflow.com/… so at some point a code change ripped markdown support in help center and left the text naked. – Shadow The Burning Wizard Mar 21 '14 at 1:01
  • @michaelb958 That's that I thought too... but I wasn't sure if it was intentional. – Albert Xing Mar 21 '14 at 2:57
  • @ShadowWizard The other example of "vote up" is fine, and so's the "set a bounty" link; can't be total Markdown failure. – michaelb958--GoFundMonica Mar 21 '14 at 4:29
  • @michaelb958 Maybe there was some migration from markdown to HTML, and it ended up being escaped? – Albert Xing Mar 21 '14 at 5:06
  • @michael right... let the devs solve the mystery then! :-) – Shadow The Burning Wizard Mar 21 '14 at 8:43
2

I'm not from StackOverflow's team (Obviously!).

But I put forward my views.

Any text wrapped inside double asterisks (**) but outside of markdown context is meant to be emphasized.

And I believe the page is out of mark down context.

I think the page is just html, otherwise ** should have been rendered as well.

So here double asterisks mean emphasization of the word. If they wanted to make it bold, they could have done it easily. It was not meant to be either italicized or bolded. I think, they wanted it to stand out from the rest.

  • 1
    Good point. But in that case, why not make it bold or italicized? Those are better ways to express emphasis than adding double asterisks. – Albert Xing Apr 14 '14 at 19:46

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .