I don't know about you, but to me happens a lot: if I'm reading a question with a LOT of answers, (specially in a really specific question) I just read the most voted up: that's the way the system was made to be, and it's really good. The most relevant voted by the community are the first ones.

Since we have TOO many users, and a lot of them are reading the same questions and answering them almost at the same time, do you think the "urge" to be the first to answer a question and so gain reputation points makes people sometimes write things too fast and not try to really elaborate a really helpful answer? We may think: "people aren't going to read all answers, so I need to be really concerned about how fast I'm to answer". Are we incentivating "objective answers", or "not so good but objective and good to be voted up"?

I'm not trying to be unfair with all answers people here provide, we have really good ones here. But supose what I wrote above is a reality: what you think it would happen if it was a "time delay" between an "up-vote or down-vote" and it's sum in the answer? Summarizing: what if the sum wasn't almost "real time"?

  • 2
    Duplicate: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/73/… (and a good idea, if I may say so myself! :) Sep 21, 2009 at 3:57
  • I tried to search for this problem but didn't know which keywords to use in my search. I think the link you provided applies to the question I made. How is going the suggestion you made?
    – GmonC
    Sep 21, 2009 at 5:02
  • There have been some changes to improve the fairness of answer display (such as by displaying answers with the same number of votes in a random order), but no progress toward the delayed vote idea that I am aware of. Sep 21, 2009 at 5:08

1 Answer 1


If you're concerned that the votes sway how you view the answers, just sort them by Newest and read down the list.

  • I agree that works for me. But we have thousands of users. I was thinking "is just me that have this thought?", and after Greg comment I discovered I'm not the only one: what about other users? Would an "automatic" approach more useful? That's the point of my question.
    – GmonC
    Sep 22, 2009 at 15:00

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .