12

Some meta posts refer, in disparaging terms, to users of SE sites (especially SO) who treat the site as a Mechanical Turk. What do they mean by that?

3
  • @starball "Mechanical Turk" is the label with which the device is referenced, and is in no way (meant to be) derogatory or insulting. I think the disparaging part had more to do with the fact this "Turk" was a fake, an empty promise, a hoax.
    – Joachim
    Apr 4 at 8:42
  • @JourneymanGeek This question refers to a term used in some instances listed in the answer to refer to a behavior. Do you object to behavior being added to this and other questions about terms that describe / explain user behaviors observed in Stack Exchange?
    – Rubén
    Sep 24 at 18:51
  • Behaviour feels meta-taggy to me as it is Sep 24 at 23:22

1 Answer 1

24

The Mechanical Turk refers to a famous fake chess-playing machine constructed in the late 18th century. Although it seemed to be a complicated mechanical computer, in fact it was an illusion. The machine concealed a human player to provide the required intelligence.

Amazon allude to the original in the name of a service, Amazon Mechanical Turk, they provide to use human intelligence to perform tasks that computers are currently unable to do. People with tasks requiring human intelligence can pay to have them done by humans across the Internet, who are in turn paid for their work.

When a Meta SE user disparaging suggests a class of question askers are treating a SE like a Mechanical Turk, they usually mean those askers are trying to farm out work they could do themselves to the volunteer experts on the site, having the volunteers do intelligent work they should do themselves. They mean that the askers are being lazy and selfish. Selfish because the question is not of a form that is likely to be useful to others (what used to be closed using the Too Localised close reason). The disparaging carries with it, I think, some resentment.

Pëkka seems to have been the first to use the term in this way (comment from 2011), but I now see that others use it.


Exhibits

  1. Stack Overflow future features from 2009
  2. Answer posted in 2010 from Software Engineering Meta
  3. Answer posted in 2013 from Politics Meta
  4. Answer posted in 2013 from Biblical Hermeneutics Meta
0

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .