5

This question already has an answer here:

I tried setting my birthday to an old age to see if it would work, but I was stopped by a message that said "Birthday must be after 1920/01/01". According to this article, 1.9 million people in the U.S. lived to 90. This number has nearly tripled since 1980.

Shouldn't we have a more realistic age cap (hence even more), like 107?

marked as duplicate by Braiam, gnat, animuson discussion Nov 10 '14 at 13:47

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • 3
    And all the days of Methuselah were nine hundred sixty and nine years: and he died. – Deer Hunter Nov 10 '14 at 13:44
  • 1
    That error message says that only people older than 95 may specify their birthday :) – CodesInChaos Nov 10 '14 at 13:44
  • 1
    Thats just discrimination against people like me (I am 100 now). – nicael Nov 10 '14 at 13:44
  • "Birthday must be before 1920/01/01"... Doesn't that mean that the user has to be OLDER than 95 rather than younger? – Doragan Nov 10 '14 at 13:45
  • @Dor He just made a mistake :) – nicael Nov 10 '14 at 13:57
  • Take a hike, grandpa. – Won't Nov 10 '14 at 16:25
  • @nicael Are you really 100 years old? o_O – Cilan Jan 22 '15 at 22:12
  • It is quite a known fact :) – nicael Jan 22 '15 at 22:20
  • @nicael I guess I'm kind of age-ist for not believing there could be a 100-year-old this active on a website community .-. – Cilan Jan 22 '15 at 22:23

Browse other questions tagged .