So there I am, making my evening run through a site I moderate, beverage of choice in hand, and I get to meta -- where I see a post from a confused or upset user that begins "the moderators {deleted my answer, closed my question, kicked my puppy} -- why?!?!" Great, I think -- what happened here? As my tea gets cold (or beer gets warm) I start digging, eventually to discover that a well-meaning passing SE employee perceived a problem and "fixed" it.1
Now this can of course happen with fellow mods -- who's got time and inclination to track every single action each of my peers takes? -- but the difference is that the mod teams, at least the ones I'm part of, tend to talk about site-governance philosophy rather a bit and bring anything that might be controversial to the others right up front. Each site is a little different and on our site we know that UserA and UserB have been improving a previously-hostile pattern of interaction, that questions about such-and-such topic that looks like a bad fit are ok if they conform to carefully-crafted guidelines, that we've recently adjusted this aspect of our scope and need to give people an extra helping hand, etc. We mods know that stuff, but it is unrealistic to expect employees to be able to track that stuff for 130+ sites. So the result is that sometimes a well-meaning employee gets it wrong and makes a mess that the mods have to clean up.
And we don't know about it until it blows up.
We can ask them to pop into the mod chat rooms and let us know, but that doesn't always work. It'd be better if we had an easy way to find out what diamond-level actions have been taken by people other than the site's moderators. This would let us get out in front of brewing problems, give us a chance to ask "hey, why'd you do that?" (if we can't tell) before our users call us on it, and allow us to respond with something resembling an informed and unified face instead of having to say "gee, I dunno... lemme see what I can find out" when asked in chat.
I'm imagining something simple like a single reverse-chronological list of recent diamond-only actions taken by employees at the bottom of the moderator-dashboard page. Flags handled (and mod messages) already show up elsewhere; this is for everything else.
1 And yes, mods routinely get blamed for staff actions because we all have the same diamond and some people don't notice who's who. That's a different problem.
Addendum: Changing the mod dashboard so that it lists everybody who's been active on the site, rather than just ones who've handled flags, would also meet this need. I just want easy access to information that is currently only available if you go hunting for it -- which, for actions that should be rare, is not practical. I asked for information about employee actions because we already get information about mod actions, not to set up some sort of us-versus-them tension.