There is constant ongoing discussion about what flags to use when, review queue processing, review queue structure, flag handling, etc., but no one person seems to know exactly how this all works. Various people contribute various bits of knowledge about the system in conversations, most knowledge seems to be passed on by word of mouth. There's often discussion of, say, review queues, that only a few seem to understand despite the apparent large implications for the whole site. The Help Center covers various bits and pieces of this system.
My question is basically: What possible paths can a question take in its life (what is its 'life cycle'), what actions can be performed on it, and what effects do these actions have? How is a question passed around through the various layers of flagging and reviewing and processing?
What would really be awesome is a flowchart of some kind.
I know these starting points, although I don't really know where it goes from there. Also it seems different per site, adding extra complication (with a subset of what I don't understand indicated in bold). Wall of bullets follows, but that's kind of the point; I think this list is an accurate representation of the confusion:
- Open questions can be:
- New ones are placed in first post review queue or automatically placed in low quality queue, I think, based on some heuristic?
- Automatically deleted after a certain amount of time, provided their score is below a certain threshold, and... no answers have been given? Or accepted?
- Closed. Moderators can perform any of these instantly, otherwise requires 5 votes:
- Duplicate: Gold hammer or majority vote marks question as duplicate and closes.
- Duplicates now also bring up this new dialog where OP can fast track the closure, I think.
- Unclear/Broad/Opinion: Close reason attached, question closed.
- Off-Topic -> Belongs on another site. Question... migrated automatically? What happens here?
- Closed for other off-topic reasons: Close reason attached, question closed. Although some of these reasons link to other sites, but don't follow the migration path? (E.g. On SO there seems to be a difference between Off Topic -> Questions about General Computing belong on SU and Off Topic -> Another Site -> SU... right...?)
- First vote puts in close review queue. Review queue exact counts are still fuzzied (I think). Review queue order is determined by some heuristic based on age and number of closevotes? (So I've heard)
- Duplicate: Gold hammer or majority vote marks question as duplicate and closes.
- Deleted directly by a moderator (unless there's a privilege that allows direct delete by users?) or OP (but not when it has an answer).
- Migrated directly by a moderator (or possibly automatically from the paths above?) These appear in some list on 10K tools.
- Edited
- Instantly by OP, moderator, users with edit privileges
- Suggested by registered users without privileges. Goes to edit review queue. Or OP can accept edit immediately.
- Suggested by unregistered or anonymous users? Goes to edit review queue, or some other queue?
- Flagged
- For any of the reasons above
- By a user with no closevote privileges. Then question goes to... what queue?
- By a user with closevote privileges, then... what happens?Difference between e.g. voting to close as opinion-based and flagging as opinion-based?
- VLQ: Goes to VLQ queue? Or, on the sites that have it, triage? Or help and improvement? Where does it go from here?
- Spam: Some threshold of spam flags (how many?) cause question to be auto deleted by Community, and then, user banned? Spam flags also draw mod attention, or does it leave mods unbothered?
- Offensive/abusive: Some threshold of flags auto deletes question?
- Custom flags, goes to mods?
- And for any of those flags; flag declined if and only if the question ends up in a queue and somebody raises a different kind of flag on it, or... what causes flags to show as declined, esp. on questions that end up closed via flags?
- For any of the reasons above
- Closed questions:
- Can be deleted by votes. Number of votes required somehow based on question score or activity. Unsure of details.
- First delete vote puts them in delete vote list in 10K tools.
- Can be reopened by votes, or directly by moderators. First reopen vote goes into a queue?
- Can still be flagged spam, offensive, custom.
- Deleted questions:
- Can be undeleted by votes. Unsure if required vote count varies.
- Can be undeleted by moderator.
- Can be undeleted by OP if OP was the one that deleted it?
And then there's all the queues alluded to above:
- Close Votes: Questions come here as soon as they get one close vote but there are rules to ordering (mentioned above).
- LQP: On SO this appears to be for answers only, but for both questions and answers on other sites.
- Looks OK: Not sure what this does. Invalidates flags? Skips
- Edit: Edits question and then... does something?
- Skip, etc.; similar confusions to triage below.
- Triage: Not sure how questions get here. Not available on all sites.
- Looks OK: Not sure what this does. Auto declines flags? Removes from queue?
- Should Be Improved: Moves to H&I queue?
- Unsalvageable: Raises a flag, returning back to complicate flow described above. Not sure how this affects the queue itself.
- Suggested Edits: Mentioned above. Edits can be rejected or approved or rejected and edited or approved and edited or skipped, final decision by vote.
- Reopen votes:
- Leave Closed: Is this the same as skip or does it cancel something out?
- Edit and Reopen: Edits and casts reopen vote in one shot (seems strange when I think about it; for another topic).
- Reopen: Casts vote.
- Skip: Somehow different than leave closed.
- H&I: Needs improvement from triage.
- First Posts, Late Posts: Some heuristic puts questions here. Then actions like the above can be taken.
Does that list above look long and rambly? Yes. And that's the cause of my question. That list is probably missing about 50% of the details of question-related actions and state; it's an incomplete low quality list that still probably took me about 30-40 minutes to write just now, with much back and forth and editing. This system is extremely complicated, and there does not seem to be any one source of documentation or any one given person that knows how it works. Sometimes I wonder if the SE team themselves know how it works!
Now, many of the bold points above can be found in various posts on meta and scattered through the Help Center; however, it would take a significant amount of effort to put a comprehensive list together by hunting on metas and it would still be incomplete (or based on non-credible sources or unknowingly on out-of-date information) - and by "significant" I mean this also includes, say, reading through comments on unrelated questions to glean casually dropped tidbits of information about how the system works, among other things. Isn't there documentation somewhere?
To be clear, I think it's a great system. Ongoing discussions about changes to it can be found all over meta, blogs, and in chats. However, it would be nice to know how the whole thing actually works in order to actually be able to participate in these conversations (and, at minimum, knowing how the system works lets users make educated decisions about what to do, and use the system to its fullest potential). The system is mind-bogglingly complicated and it would be nice to reel it in a bit, especially given all the conversation of late about triage and H&I -- it's getting to be time to clear up the details, I think.
At the moment I try to participate in discussions when I can, and cast close votes or flags without really knowing what happens, trusting the system to do the right thing. Sometimes I yell at people for voting to close instead of flagging as spam, not because I know why, but because I've seen others say the same thing and it seems right.