Why can't people see that the egg game is just a cycle:

downvote (do not close)

once successful, a cycle adds a star to the right sections, gradually filling them each cycle. Each star lasts for 4 votes. Go figure :)

(and once every 10 cycles, close)

Proof by counter example(acceptable?): current game has idiots who cannot count.

closed as off-topic by doppelgreener, ShaWiz, rene, Jeremy Banks, Patrick Hofman Apr 1 '15 at 7:34

  • This question does not appear to be about the software that powers the Stack Exchange network within the scope defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • Is that the optimal strategy, though? How many days does it take to win? – balpha Apr 1 '15 at 5:17
  • @balpha I'd say 5 cycles to fill the stars, and continuations to keep it full. – Samveen Apr 1 '15 at 5:21
  • 2
    "I'd say" doesn't particularly sound like you have a lot of empirical evidence :) – balpha Apr 1 '15 at 5:22
  • @balpha give me a method to get empirical evidence and I'll give it to you :) – Samveen Apr 1 '15 at 5:24
  • 7
    A strange game. The only losing move is not to play. – balpha Apr 1 '15 at 5:25
  • 7
    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because this is a rant – doppelgreener Apr 1 '15 at 5:54

If the goal is to win the Internet, you just lost your shirt.

When an April fool's easter egg game becomes cause to rant on meta and call other players of said easter egg game "idiots", I'm pretty sure you're taking it too seriously and, as far as I can see, that's the only sure way to loose. Because then the joke is on you.

Lighten up. Click some buttons.

  • 8
    Clicked. The upvote and the accept. – Samveen Apr 1 '15 at 6:02

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .