I've searched Gaming.SE for battlefield 4 skill. Results don't include anything relevant.

However, if you'd search for same thing using Google, number four result for me is How is Skill calculated?

I'd expect it to be one of top results using internal search, yet it isn't.

  • It's the way the search works. Probably based on keyword weight/frequency etc. So the keyword "Battlefield" in your search is more prominent in questions and answers than "skill". If you search gaming site for "How is Skill calculated?" you get your result at the top. Search code and algos are black magic though, and as with Google you usually have to play around with keywords a bit in the search
    – James
    Apr 27, 2015 at 4:13
  • 1
    @James well, two things, first of all I'd expect it to put results relevant to both battlefield and skill on top. Secondly, it's be great if it could recognize that search term battlefield 4 is related to [battlefield-4] tag.
    – vartec
    Apr 27, 2015 at 4:30
  • 4
    I know where you're coming from, but "battlefield 4" text is not necessarily always going to be in "battlfield-4" tag. You can search in tags using the square brackets, eg [battlefield-4] skills also returns your required question at the top - gaming.stackexchange.com/search?q=[battlefield-4]+skills
    – James
    Apr 27, 2015 at 4:32
  • 1
    We append the most popular tag of a question to its title for display purposes (see the title on that question page). Google matches on this appended title. Internally, we search title without the appended tags, and tags as-is. This means that "battlefield 4" is not the same as "battlefield-4" tag unfortunately. I'm open to testing an adjustment to make this function more like Google. Thoughts?
    – Haney
    Apr 29, 2015 at 13:18
  • @Haney: IMO tags should be indexed by search engine, maybe with priority even higher than title. Obviously you'd want to replace "-" with " " first.
    – vartec
    Apr 30, 2015 at 3:09
  • @vartec they are currently indexed, but only tokenized on whitespace, aka the entity is "battlefield-4". We could analyze it as "battlefield 4" instead, but this would probably have side effects (I think of "C", "C++", and "C#" all becoming just "C")
    – Haney
    Apr 30, 2015 at 13:32
  • @Haney: not full tokenizing, just considering adding - a white-space char. Or indexing both terms, one with - and other with - replaced by space. Either way, that's implementation specifics. If you'd put what you've written in comments into an answer, I'll accept that.
    – vartec
    Apr 30, 2015 at 18:46
  • @vartec - I think I want to take this on. I'm handing off a lot of the search work to a developer on my team, so I might use this as an easy-ish "get your feet wet" feature request to introduce them to search. :)
    – Haney
    Apr 30, 2015 at 20:08


You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .