19

Currently it's in the format..

MM/DD/YYYY

..which confuses me. It's also ambiguous (for 12 days a month anyway), and inconsistent with other parts of the site, such as the Recent page: "Showing 2009-07-05 to 2009-07-05"

Could it be changed to the ISO 8601 (international standard) format?

YYYY-MM-DD
1
  • 1
    What about "sep 13 '09 at 5:19 "? (as in "asked ...."). This should also be ISO8601. That's the standard. Feb 20, 2011 at 15:41

2 Answers 2

14

I am in favor in the ISO 8601 standard due that it follows a setup where a date is numerically larger than a date it it's past.

2010-07-05 (1 year from now)
2009-07-05 (today)
2009-06-05 (1 month ago)

20100705 > 20090705 > 20090605

And it's very logical to read a date where you go from the largest entity to the smallest.

2009-07-05 09:00:00
10

Eh... You've got the whole tooltip, why go with such a brief date format?

On Sunday the fifth of July, at one second, thirty-six minutes past five o'clock post-meridiem coordinated universal time, in the year of Our Lord two thousand and nine...

3
  • 3
    Or we could use Roman Numerals: MMIX-VII-V
    – jrcs3
    Jul 5, 2009 at 19:31
  • 1
    @jrcs3: I would hunt you down and kill you! :-) Feb 4, 2014 at 3:37
  • He's not my lord. :P
    – user261920
    Jun 5, 2015 at 7:59

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .