The situation is as follows: there are 6 people in the team, we work together and come up to an answer/question. They all have legit profiles - they are not sock puppets. However, sometimes we do upvote a post if we consider that it might help us individually or as a team.
Question: might this be considered a voting anomaly?
There is a small paragraph in meta blog:
We now perform a more detailed statistical analysis on voting patterns. Any voting patterns that are too far outside the statistical norm will be nullified.
Does it applies to my situation?