I'm posting this just as feedback and discussion point.
Perhaps it could be used to tweak the audit system in some way.
(Plus it's amusing)
The audit (possible spam)
The problem, & 2 questions/ideas
Ignoring Jon's fame, the following could be true for plenty of other audits:
The user has lots of reps, many many badges, etc.
What about audits only using posts from users below a certain rep? Such as less than 1k.
This would perhaps stop the reviewer from seeing lots of rep/badges and just assuming it must be ok, and instead actual take time to review properly.
I know it could be said "it worked, you did your job", but a "quick" glance would lead to "Looks OK" and pass the audit.
Audits are supposed to check people are reviewing adequately enough, but perhaps quick glances are not always enough, so doesn't really confirm the user is "doing enough" in general or on other reviews if they "always" do quick glances - i.e. they were lucky on this occasion and could have been real spam.
Users doing quick/robo reviews are more likely to hit "looks ok" as it's no work.
Whereas "Edit" and "Recommend Deletion" require work and choices. "Skip" gets them no review score.
So, would it be possible/useful to only have audits which are not ok? - so always need an edit or recommend deletion?