3

I have a programming question which is similar to some posts in SO, but neither an exact match to my scenario nor providing adequate information. Although some posts were helpful and I povided upvotes too.
So, should I post such a question which can be a potential duplicate but not an exact one? Since the question has bugged me for days and I never was successful to get to the end of it.

Appreciate any sort of help on this. Thank you for your time.

1 Answer 1

4

It looks like you have already done some substantial research before posting. From that research you already learned that they seem to have just a little twist that doesn't quite fit your situation.

Your potential question should be build-up around that research. Something like this:

I've a similar issue described in [Foo] and [Bar] but in my situation I have also to deal with FuBar.

I used the answer from [Foo] to give the result A but I can't use the upvoted answer from [Bar] because the compiler complains about unicorns.

I assumed that adding waffles to [Foo] and [Bar] would make things fly. (added an MCVE if possible)

What is the correct approach to FuBar?

Make sure to add (code) examples and compiler and test-output if relevant that also shows that the other approaches indeed don't give the desired result. Try to keep in mind that you have to make sure that the regulars in that tag get convinced it is not a duplicate. A clear statement on what is special/different in your context is key!

Avoid to only mention (without any evidence) that your question is not a duplicate because that is almost always a direct reason for a close vote.

1
  • 1
    +1 and Accepted. That information was very much helpful. Will post now. Keeping all this in mind
    – mustangDC
    Jun 6, 2015 at 4:32

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .