I found two or three times that someone was a ♦ moderator on a specific site in the SE Network, but now is not a moderator.

Can moderators resign?

Is it also possible for a moderator to be dismissed if many violations/complaints are made?

Or if a moderator is inactive for a long time will that cause dismissal?


2 Answers 2


Can a moderator resign?

Yes, absolutely, if they feel that the relationship isn't tenable going forward for any reason. The most common reason for this is typically great news for the mod - something new in their lives needs a whole lot of attention, typically in the form of a new child or job.

Moderation is a volunteer effort, these are people that say my enthusiasm for what my community is doing is valuable to me, I want to do everything I can to help.

Resigning in no way means quitting, it just means that they simply don't have time to offer any longer. We will revoke access upon request, with heaps of thanks, and usually some swag to boot.

Is it also possible for a moderator to be dismissed if many violations/complaints are made?

Moderators often by definition have to make decisions that aren't going to be popular, to say the least. We would not remove someone from their post unless they were actively harmful to the growth of their site, despite efforts by us to explain why this was the case. And even then - being at odds with us (Stack Exchange) isn't a reason to remove someone, as long as the dissention is respectful and reasonably categorized as possibly constructive.

If they're clearly acting in the capacity of a champion of their community, with consensus, we'd never dream of removing them.

Violation of the moderator agreement is very likely to lead to dismissal.

Or if a moderator is inactive for a long time will that cause dismissal?

Yes, if every effort we make to reach out to them results in crickets chirping, we have a leadership vacuum that we need to fill. This usually takes months to come about, not weeks, not days.

The immediate needs of the site provides important context, however. If the site needs more moderator attention now, we'd clearly indicate that when contacting them, and act in the best interest of the site.

In short

We're reluctant to remove a moderator without clear and compelling evidence that doing so would be more beneficial to their community than their presence as a moderator, and we understand and respect that people have lives.


If s/he hasn't made a public statement (like on the site meta or in the chat room) or the community moderators haven't made a post on your site about it (which they would be unlikely to do anyway, but hey) then it's something that isn't public knowledge.

In that case, no, you can't find out. And aside from curiosity, what benefit would there be in finding out? Initially they were deemed worthy to be a moderator, and now for whatever reason they are no longer carrying out that role. That shouldn't affect what happens to the site going forward. If they wanted to talk about it then they would.

As for whether a long period of inactivity would cause a mod to be removed - unlikely unless it's really causing the site problems. It's more likely they additional mods would be added rather than quiet ones be removed.

  • 3
    There has been precedent for inactivity causing a moderator to be removed (recently, actually). But the only other post I can find is on Meta Super User saying the limit is 6 months. Commented Jun 24, 2015 at 11:51

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .