That's actually quite noticeable on the high-resolution screens, the bottom part of the logo is creeping farther than the others.
Go to the http://blog.stackexchange.com
Look at the logo:
Look a bit closer:
-
19You need to check your eyesight - most people don't browse at that resolution...– OdedJul 3, 2015 at 21:43
-
5Go fix it.– hichris123Jul 3, 2015 at 21:43
-
@hich Interesting idea, though I'm away from computer currently. I'll think about it tomorrow.– nicaelJul 3, 2015 at 22:01
-
I am sure you'd find a way, @nicael - you've made a solid start– user289879Jul 4, 2015 at 7:23
-
@san Pretty solid, I'd say. Week / month / quarter first rank :)– nicaelJul 4, 2015 at 7:32
-
14Hello close voters; I'm not sure how many times we have to go into this but you not liking something does not make it "off-topic" let alone "primarily opinion based". If you don't understand this set up a chat room and I'll be happy to explain, with examples.– ben is uǝq backwardsJul 4, 2015 at 8:01
-
@hichris123 I've made a pull request!– nicaelJul 4, 2015 at 9:50
-
3Guys, on topic. How is it an opinion - this exists?– TimJul 4, 2015 at 10:09
-
@Tim I don't really get your second sentence...– nicaelJul 4, 2015 at 10:13
-
1Under reasonable circumstances it's non-reproducible, an option under off topic closes. @ben– randomJul 4, 2015 at 13:45
-
3Great, now I can't not notice it. >:(– PollyannaJul 4, 2015 at 14:31
-
@Adam I pushed a pull request fixing it, hope it gets approved :)– nicaelJul 4, 2015 at 14:32
-
2@random while silly, nitpicking, [put your own word here], this is still a valid bug report. Voting to reopen while of course casting a downvote.– Shadow Wizard Says No More WarJul 5, 2015 at 12:57
-
You might think it's primarily opinion based, but the original vote was for non-reproducible @sha– randomJul 5, 2015 at 14:06
-
2This is fantastic.– JeremyJul 10, 2015 at 5:00
|
Show 3 more comments
3 Answers
I mean...I don't even...okay. It's fixed.
answered Jul 4, 2015 at 22:47
-
2
-
-
Though probably I should have also moved the top stack up a bit... That's tomorrow!– nicaelJul 4, 2015 at 23:00
-
3@nicael You should have probably make sure any submissions like this are 100% done and final :) Essentially you are now fixing a bug on your own work :D– JamesJul 5, 2015 at 11:59
-
1
-
4I left it on the dev tier for a while before pushing to production. Because...you know...stunned. Jul 5, 2015 at 18:50
-
There's, someone-on-the-wing, some... thing...
Look at the logo:
Look a bit closer:
I accept there is genuinely a fault there, but only when you zoom in to such a degree that you are no longer actually viewing the content, and are just trying to find dust with white gloves...
If you walk up to a billboard poster, and look at it from like 1 foot away, all you see is blurry coloured dots.
Should they... fix them?
Let's look at it "normal-like":
Nuffin' wrong wi' it.
-
-
-
2@nicael Nice :) Though, I think it's only done because you pushed it though Git = you've done most of the work, & they test/check & roll out. Whereas a bug report on MSE = they do all the work. Where possible, perhaps you should push your bug reports into git, at least then you have a chance of getting them authorised :)– JamesJul 5, 2015 at 11:56
Maybe, for some reason that little microscopic quirk is a deliberate part of the design too - is there any specific documentation about the design, right down to the minuscule minutiae that you have highlighted?
Even if it is a 'fault', it is so outrageously insignificant, that:
a) No one notices unless you zoom in (as James' answer)
b) People generally don't care, if they notice, they are probably looking for content to read or to answer.
c) If they do notice and do care, they realise that in terms of the whole site, this kind of bug fix is a majorly low priority.
tl:dr It is so minor that it really is not a major concern
-
2
-
good for you...– user289879Jul 5, 2015 at 22:14