That's actually quite noticeable on the high-resolution screens, the bottom part of the logo is creeping farther than the others.
Go to the http://blog.stackexchange.com
Look at the logo:
Look a bit closer:
-11
-
19You need to check your eyesight - most people don't browse at that resolution... – Oded Jul 3 '15 at 21:43
-
5Go fix it. – hichris123 Jul 3 '15 at 21:43
-
@hich Interesting idea, though I'm away from computer currently. I'll think about it tomorrow. – nicael Jul 3 '15 at 22:01
-
I am sure you'd find a way, @nicael - you've made a solid start – user289879 Jul 4 '15 at 7:23
-
@san Pretty solid, I'd say. Week / month / quarter first rank :) – nicael Jul 4 '15 at 7:32
-
14Hello close voters; I'm not sure how many times we have to go into this but you not liking something does not make it "off-topic" let alone "primarily opinion based". If you don't understand this set up a chat room and I'll be happy to explain, with examples. – ben is uǝq backwards Jul 4 '15 at 8:01
-
@hichris123 I've made a pull request! – nicael Jul 4 '15 at 9:50
-
3Guys, on topic. How is it an opinion - this exists? – Tim Jul 4 '15 at 10:09
-
@Tim I don't really get your second sentence... – nicael Jul 4 '15 at 10:13
-
1Under reasonable circumstances it's non-reproducible, an option under off topic closes. @ben – random Jul 4 '15 at 13:45
-
3Great, now I can't not notice it. >:( – Adam Davis 'ze-zir-zem' Jul 4 '15 at 14:31
-
@Adam I pushed a pull request fixing it, hope it gets approved :) – nicael Jul 4 '15 at 14:32
-
2@random while silly, nitpicking, [put your own word here], this is still a valid bug report. Voting to reopen while of course casting a downvote. – Shadow The Princess Wizard Jul 5 '15 at 12:57
-
You might think it's primarily opinion based, but the original vote was for non-reproducible @sha – random Jul 5 '15 at 14:06
-
2This is fantastic. – Jeremy Banks Jul 10 '15 at 5:00
17
I mean...I don't even...okay. It's fixed.
-
2
-
-
Though probably I should have also moved the top stack up a bit... That's tomorrow! – nicael Jul 4 '15 at 23:00
-
3@nicael You should have probably make sure any submissions like this are 100% done and final :) Essentially you are now fixing a bug on your own work :D – James Jul 5 '15 at 11:59
-
1
-
4I left it on the dev tier for a while before pushing to production. Because...you know...stunned. – Jon Chan♦ Jul 5 '15 at 18:50
-
10
There's, someone-on-the-wing, some... thing...
Look at the logo:
Look a bit closer:
I accept there is genuinely a fault there, but only when you zoom in to such a degree that you are no longer actually viewing the content, and are just trying to find dust with white gloves...
If you walk up to a billboard poster, and look at it from like 1 foot away, all you see is blurry coloured dots.
Should they... fix them?
Let's look at it "normal-like":
Nuffin' wrong wi' it.
-
-
-
2@nicael Nice :) Though, I think it's only done because you pushed it though Git = you've done most of the work, & they test/check & roll out. Whereas a bug report on MSE = they do all the work. Where possible, perhaps you should push your bug reports into git, at least then you have a chance of getting them authorised :) – James Jul 5 '15 at 11:56
4
Maybe, for some reason that little microscopic quirk is a deliberate part of the design too - is there any specific documentation about the design, right down to the minuscule minutiae that you have highlighted?
Even if it is a 'fault', it is so outrageously insignificant, that:
a) No one notices unless you zoom in (as James' answer)
b) People generally don't care, if they notice, they are probably looking for content to read or to answer.
c) If they do notice and do care, they realise that in terms of the whole site, this kind of bug fix is a majorly low priority.
tl:dr It is so minor that it really is not a major concern
-
2
-
good for you... – user289879 Jul 5 '15 at 22:14
