This question already has an answer here:
I'm wondering where on StackExchange I could ask for how other people interpret a specific license agreement and also whether people have rejected to agree to the specific liencese agreement because of certain aspects within it.
It would be very helpful to gain insights from other people's view on the specific service agreement in order to decide whether or not to agree to the license and start using the service.
You hereby grant Company an irrevocable, non-exclusive, royalty-free, transferable license, with rights to sublicense, to use, reproduce, modify, display, perform and create derivative works of the Applications, the Content and the Brand Features and Marks for the sole purpose of allowing the Company to provide the Company Software and the Services to You.
For me it is very important that the content I would put into my Firebase database would remain mine and that it would only be used by/accessible to those that I explicitly grant access.
The license agreement says that I would grant Firebase the right to use the content (which is something I do not wish to agree to), but on the other hand it also says that Firebase is only granted to do so for the sole purpose of providing the service to me.
I'm confused by this and would appreciate any sites that I can ask questions about this issue.