For unrelevant reasons, I get banned by the StackExchange system on the past year, I think it was on Mar 11 '14 but I'm not sure.
For whatever reason I get downvotes, moderators have deleted some of my questions in the past then the system sentenced me with a restriction of publishing new questions in SuperUser.com, I can't ask any question there.
Here I opened a recent question about this issue:
...but what I'm asking now here is totally different.
Please, before judge me, take only 1 minute to revise my activity on SuperUser.com, is not much but... I think that I put a lot of effort on contributions, I'll do a little resume:
What I did from 2014 after I get banned, until today:
- I obtained 17 upvotes, a total of 130 reputation.
- I did 37 edits on user questions (most retags), a total of 74 reputation.
- I accepted 8 answers on old questions, a total 10 of reputation (3 answers was of my own).
- I obtained 1 accepted answer, a total of 15 reputation.
Sum of contributions realized after ban: 63
(but I did a lot more of acts, like suggested edits that are waiting to be accepted and that things...)
Sum of reputation gained after ban: +229
Sum of time spent praying myself for the unban: Infinite.
Today I spent literaly the 24 hours contributing to SuperUser.com, my activity page doesn't lie.
Now, compare the reputation that an user can lost in downvotes to deserve a ban, and compare it with the lot of rep and contributions that I did after that, how is this possibly?. Which kind of wrong balance we can think the system uses after comparison?.
So... how its possible that after this effort of activity, the system didn't unbanned me already?.
How much expect the StackExchange system from an user to do?.
I understood more or less how StackExchange manages the system bans, I know that moderators cannot unban.
This post is intended to get the attention of a higher level than common moderation because these circunstances are extremelly strange, really for me seems a bug then I need help from someone who can help me to clarify these doubts:
I'm suffering any kind of bug?, or really I should contribute more to get rid of this prohibition sentence?. If yes, HOW MUCH MORE IS EXPECTED!? (angry face)
Do you imagine how can this kind of ban affect an user who only can make two or three contributions at day or at week? ...the system will take 5 years to unban him?. Its just ridiculous, I don't see any equilibrated balance at least in my situation.
I really don't have words... I'm very frustrated with this prohibition on superuser.com, if this is not a bug then the system is very, very, very very very exigent or abusive about user contributions requisites to "tick" the unban meter.
This really has any sense, I keep putting a lot of effort contributing in SuperUser.com but every user that contributes in a page needs to be rewarded with "things" on the site in which that user is contributing, because no body will contribute eternally in a page to gain absolutely nothing, do you understand what I mean?, I think is reasonable what I say, people do things to gain something, people need to answer and also to make questions, what I gain I if I can't publish a damn question after that effort? I should still contribute forever until I die for no beneffit?.