I have read the Exit strategy for chameleon questions post, but I am looking for some kind of formal statement or general consensus regarding the problem of people editing their questions in such a way that existing answers become invalid. It seems like this would be a handy resource to have, and the chameleon questions post sort of presupposes that this is a no-no, but it doesn't really say "DON'T DO THAT!".

I would especially appreciate something that is totally applicable to every SE (I'm asking because it has come up on SF&F, so SF&F should be covered by the policy), not just SO.

1 Answer 1


I am assuming that you are asking about every Stack Exchange site except the Metas - because Metas are different and allow Q&A to be used for . My answer below does not apply to Meta sites, only to Main sites.

I think askers should feel free to edit their questions as much as they like until the first answer has been received.

Once an answer has been received I think the asker should only make changes to their question that help clarify it further, and that do not strand the answer as being no longer applicable to the question.

I think edits to questions that strand an answer, should be rolled back.

From this point on improvement should be to the Q&A as a combined entity rather than to the question without regard to any existing answers.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .