Recently I wrote this post in which I used an image that I found off a random website online that was relevant to my question to make the post more asthetically pleasing to viewers. As you can see I listed the image source at the bottom of my post. Note also that I never use portrait images so as to not make the post too long. Remember also that the images are being used for educational purposes. Not only that, but sourcing images in most cases may attract more healthy traffic on to the sites that have provided the images for potentially years to come.

What I want to know:

  • Is it okay to use any image off the internet in your posts as long as you source the image at the bottom of the question?
  • Is the assumption that the images are used for educational purposes on the site enough to allow me to use it?
  • Should I keep doing this or just write plain text in my questions?

1 Answer 1


I am not sure rules exist, but I'm happy to propose some:

If an image contributes facts and backgrounds to the question, do be sure to include one.

Images are practically mandatory on plant identification questions over on Gardening, for example. I can also imagine that UX or design questions that just described a user interface without a picture would be silly. Some CSS or other "why is this off by one pixel" questions need a picture to show what the problem is. On Movies and TV they are popular for questions about characters you might not remember by name. Puzzling leans heavily on them, too.

Never use an image of text where text belongs (the error message you're getting, for questions on a programming site, for example)

I hope this is self explanatory but image text can't be found with searches, can't easily be pasted elsewhere, and so on.

If the image is there only to inspire, uplift, or otherwise get to "asthetically pleasing", leave it out. We really aren't about asthetically pleasing.

If I could understand your question (and answer it) just as well without the cat, mountain stream, Facebook meme about footprints, cheerful cartoon about programming, or whatever, then just leave it out. If you don't, chances are someone will edit it out. Readers have limited time (and in some cases, space) and on all the SE sites, we optimize for efficiency, not for mood.

To be specific: the example you linked to is the third case and I would suggest not doing it. A picture of a happy dipstick level might be ok, since it gives context for answers that mention the overfill line or the minimum level line or whatever.

As for attribution, fair use, "but I gave credit" and so on, IANAL and if you're not sure, don't post that particular image at all. I restrict myself to screen shots I took, photos I took, and (on rare occasions) Creative Commons licensed pictures.

  • 1
    So in short - you're saying not to include the image unless it helps you explain the question to others? That is useful to know. Thanks. Jan 11, 2016 at 22:15
  • 7
    I'm not a lawyer either, but I hang out on Law.se, and the image in question is about as clear-cut an example of copyright violation as I've ever seen.
    – Mark
    Jan 11, 2016 at 22:39

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .