I dropped by earlier today to flag up a site that's scraping SE content and reposting it without attribution. The question was quickly closed with a note pointing me to this question. Fair enough. I'd actually tagged my question as copycat-sites, so I suppose I should have done a quick search for this tag before posting.
The tag itself isn't very informative, though. Here is the entire contents of its tag wiki as of right now:
I thought the addition of some actual words might be an improvement, so I suggested this:
Contributions to Stack Exchange sites are available under a cc-by-sa 3.0 license, which means they can be copied to other sites as long as the original contributors are attributed. Sites that copy content without attribution should be reported to the Stack Exchange administrators.
For more information, see the answers to this question:
This edit does not make the post even a little bit easier to read, easier to find, more accurate or more accessible. Changes are either completely superfluous or actively harm readability.
I really don't understand what I'm doing wrong here. Is the copycat-sites tag wiki supposed to be empty?