4

Possible Duplicate:
Can we disallow the use of “belongs-on-xxxxxxx” and “not-programming-related” tags?

Is there an official position on this? Do we or don't we like adding "belongs-on-x" tags when closing? Personally I don't like it at all, since it's editing the question itself to support the closer's opinion, which hasn't been validated by the community yet.

marked as duplicate by Troggy, fretje, Rex M, gnostradamus, Ladybug Killer Nov 2 '09 at 19:48

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

5

I agree with you. I don't see what purpose the tags serve. Is anyone going to search for posts based on a "belongs-on-x" tag? I don't see why they would. They just cause a little more work when a post does get migrated and the now silly looking tag needs to be removed. I remove them when I see them.

2

For the record, the official position from Jeff is that belongs-on-* should not even exist:

you're not going deep enough: these tags should not exist, period.

I swear I thought there was also another answer of Jeff's on this question ... But I do not see it anymore.

That's about as close to official policy as we can get. I started retagging a bunch of [belongs-on-superuser]-tagged items last week when I started seeing it a lot on SO. (Mostly guys who just got the ability to retag.)

1

Since I believe a feature is in the works to prevent users tagging things as belongs-on-x (source), I think they should not be used. Also, this question details how to deal with occurrences of them.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .