When I'm entering reviews on Stack Overflow I'm seeing:
https://stackoverflow.com/review/first-posts/14369458 is a textbook example of a poor question. "No action needed" is completely wrong. Come back in 5 days to continue reviewing.
I'm aware of some audit questions in reviews but after reviewing that one I haven't got any warning that I marked bad question as No action needed. What more I was banned about a week after doing wrong review.
My question is does this message means I was ban by moderator? And why I was banned without any explanation, message and why after a week?
I agree that question is not good quality. Maybe I've missed it maybe haven't understood. But I would expect some warning before banning review. Maybe it is also good idea to show some stats to user: how many wrong reviews I did to allow me analyse and improve my behaviour not just ban. For me such communicate makes me think: why should I care about doing reviews at all? I will just keep my edit privs for those questions which I'm answering and don't care all review queues.
Please don't understand me wrong. I understand I did something wrong but way I was communicated and lack of some stats discourage me in participating in this area at all.
Don't you think user who do some wrong reviews should be warned about it? Got some access to stats about wrong reviews? Maybe it is better to force user to browse his wrong reviews to learn him something not just ban?