This question already has an answer here:

While browsing Stack Overflow, I noticed that I lost a lot of reputation:

http://img97.imageshack.us/img97/6452/downvoteparty.jpg

Is this serial downvoting? Will it be corrected by a rep-recalculation? How often are those done?


Here's a second instance:

http://img8.imageshack.us/img8/4480/downvoteparty2.jpg

marked as duplicate by George Stocker May 8 '13 at 14:04

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • 6
    "Who cares." Your opponent or whatever can only do this once anyway, so its not really a big deal. – bobobobo Jan 23 '11 at 22:14
  • 77
    that sucks... who did you piss off? Give the guy his rep back! – RSolberg Apr 26 '11 at 21:23
  • Is the time on the left how long ago you asked the question? If so, how do you ask 9 questions in 2 minutes? – Jimmy Aug 5 '11 at 2:06
  • 13
    Nope, that's when I was downvoted – Nathan Campos Aug 5 '11 at 2:08
  • 2
    @Nathan: superweak – Jimmy Aug 5 '11 at 2:25
up vote 199 down vote accepted

That's serial downvoting.

There are three ways to fix it:

  1. Do NOTHING. The daily vote anomaly script will pick it up and your rep will be recalculated automatically.
  2. If after 36 hours (give the script time to run) you still see a problem, then flag one of your posts and ask a moderator to look into the anomalous voting patterns.
  3. If it still hasn't been corrected, contact the SE team via the "contact us" link at the bottom of any page on the site.
  • 13
    I've been looking this up because there's a guy who's been obsessively e-stalking me, and attacking/insulting me on various sites. He is a pest. and I just discovered he has an SO account. I'm thinking it's only a matter of time before he discovers I'm on this network and starts serial downvoting me. What can I do to prevent a potential attack from him? Is it possible to block people on SE? Can I put him on a "moderator watch list" or something? I don't want to publish this as a question, because I'm afraid he's going to see it in the feed and discover my presence. Not sure what to do. – Braden Best May 21 '14 at 17:13
  • 2
    I don't think the SO auto-recalc algorithm works for every possibility. I had a question sitting idle for one month (stackoverflow.com/questions/36750812/…) and after I posted an unpopular answer (received 40 downvotes in a matter of hours) I started getting multiple downvotes to single questions. For example, the linked question got 3 downvotes overnight. It was a question that had been sitting idle for a month, then, whammo. I reported it, but SO didn't have my back. They said they'd look into it, but nada. – TARKUS Jun 19 '16 at 20:18
  • 1
    @TARKUS - I think your situation is most likely explained as: you posted an unpopular question, which hence got a lot of attention. People then decided to look at your profile, out of interest, and clicked links through to your older question. They then, independently, decided that the old question was a poor question too. That isn't serial downvoting. – AndyT Jun 22 '17 at 8:40
  • @AndyT Your explanation seems unlikely, for the reason that I have asked a lot of questions, not all of them great questions, and maybe some of them pretty bad questions. But only one question was the target of multiple down votes within a restricted period. – TARKUS Jun 22 '17 at 12:32
  • 1
    @TARKUS - Ah, ok. Then I agree my explanation seems unlikely. – AndyT Jun 22 '17 at 13:10
  • @AndyT I think your idea that people are going to look at my profile when I post an answer is a good one. Maybe you are right. Also, you wouldn't know this, but my answers sometimes get really nasty responses, even by high ranking members with high rep scores. I have also been asked offline (like on Skype) to up vote or down vote answers, so I think it happens. – TARKUS Jun 22 '17 at 14:45

If it was serial down-voting it should be spotted, and corrected, by the automatic processes that run.

  • 2
    it should (hopefully) be spotted – Broman Nov 20 '17 at 13:44

Addressing a specific concern expressed in a duplicate question - note that based on details of a particular incident that involved serial voting, it is most likely that vote reversal script uses some data about prior abuse.

In other words, the guy who serially voted you once, will have harder time trying it next time, even if they vote less.

In the incident mentioned above, vote reversal script has been caught at cancelling a "series" of 2 (t-w-o) votes. The only feasible explanation for this is that script somehow took into account that suspected votes came from someone previously caught at abusive voting at the same "target poster".

Screen shot below shows a sequence of vote reversals that are likely done at "script time" 03:00.

http://i.stack.imgur.com/o1kqF.jpg

My reading for the data shown at screen shot is as follows. There's +4 entry revealing that reversal has been done for at least two users. And since total amount of votes reversed is (4+2+2+2)/2=5, this means that at least one of reversals has been done for a user who voted less than 3 times.

  • 20
    nice, and i think the one more logic need to add in to script that if same activity(upvote/downote) came from previous caught user, then user should not be able to do upvote/downvote on the affected account in future. – Lucifer Aug 22 '12 at 13:49
  • 1
    What about the case where a question has had 0 votes for a long period of time, but suddenly gets three downvotes overnight? I'm introducing the probable case where multiple individuals (or possibly sock puppets) collaborate on a downvote campaign. – TARKUS Jun 19 '16 at 20:21

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .