Recursive meta [duplicate]

Question

Possible Duplicate:
What about meta-meta stackoverflow.

Is it also appropriate to use http://meta.stackoverflow.com to discuss Meta Stack Overflow itself?

Duplicate: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/55/… – Stu Thompson Jun 28 '09 at 18:03 — Stu Thompson, Jun 28 '09 at 18:03

Richard · Accepted Answer · 2009-06-28 22:30:31Z

2

Time to re-read "Gödel, Escher, Bach".

answered Jun 28 '09 at 22:30

Richard

1,8381 gold badge14 silver badges22 bronze badges

add a comment |

klew · Accepted Answer · 2009-06-28 18:01:01Z

1

I think we need meta.meta.stackoverflow.com

answered Jun 28 '09 at 18:01

klew

1

Wow, this could get ugly fast. – Dinah Jun 28 '09 at 18:03
3

so where would you discuss meta-meta-SO? ;-) – Yuval Jun 28 '09 at 19:41
A capital idea! And, when we wish to discuss the the complement of subjects covered by meta.meta.stackoverflow, we would simply go to moc.wolfrevokcats.atem.atem. – root Aug 13 '13 at 20:28
1

Additionally, am I the only one slightly freaked out by the fact that it never occured to me that echo 'stackoverflow' | rev yields the words wolf, cats, and something a Levenshtein distance of 1 away from revoke? In any case, no one tell Dan Brown. I don't want to have to deal with the consequences. – root Aug 13 '13 at 20:31

add a comment |

marked as duplicate by Tom Ritter Jun 29 '09 at 0:08