This has appeared as the dropdown on my review queue button today:

review dropdown screenshot

I can't find out anything about it.

  • What does it mean?
  • Why aren't there any review queues available to me?
  • How long it's going to stay there?! :(
  • 1
    Where are you seeing this? What site? Screenshots will help. – Oded Apr 7 '17 at 14:13
  • You can't review until you reach 2k; you haven't reached that yet. – zondo Apr 7 '17 at 14:15
  • 5
    I've been reviewing Triage, First posts, and two others (I'll check) for ages. Did the policy change? Look: stackoverflow.com/users/2532190/… – mayersdesign Apr 7 '17 at 14:16
  • 5
    @zondo - the "Access Review Queues" privilege is at 500 rep. – Oded Apr 7 '17 at 14:19
  • Of course. I was thinking that everything started with suggested edits. Sorry, false alarm. – zondo Apr 7 '17 at 14:19
  • @Oded I have this same problem on raspberry pi stackexchange I have never reviewed before – User98764431 Oct 14 '17 at 0:52
  • you can find more informations about the ban in the review page (<site>/review) – Fabrizio Mar 20 '18 at 11:20
  • 2
    I have just noticed the same thing appear on my account, suspiciously a day after I replied to a chat with someone who disagreed with my vote on a review.. Have I been banned from reviewing based on one disagreement? I thought the whole point of community reviewing was that the correct / community favoured result will prevail in the end.. – EM-Creations Apr 26 '18 at 15:30
  • Agree it's better to close the other as duplicate of this one. Reopened. – Shadow Wizard is Ear For You Sep 20 '18 at 10:08
  • Shadow the Welcoming Wizard 2 - Excellent, thanks – mayersdesign Sep 20 '18 at 12:14
  • 19
    This is a crappy way to treat folks that are trying to help the community. 💩 At least fix your messaging. Put a link to stackoverflow.com/review next to the message at least. I've been banned for 3 days. I don't know if I'll start back up after the ban or not. Right now my efforts are not feeling very appreciated. – Dan Jan 25 '19 at 15:54
  • I am getting this message for 3-4 days. No idea why it happened. – A J Jan 29 '19 at 1:45
  • 2
    If I go to stackoverflow.com/review, it shows me a link to a review which I approved, along with another follow, but another person rejected. The edit added some links (which seem legit) to some extra info. So now I'm not sure if this is the review that got me banned, and if so, why it got me banned (i.e. what was wrong with the edit). – HardcoreHenry Aug 16 '19 at 15:15
  • in addition to the accepted answer, if your votes count reqches to the limited count, you wont be able to review anymore(first posts and late answers) – El.Hum Aug 26 '19 at 13:27
  • I faced this issue too, but I passed all the test reviews correctly. – AmerllicA Mar 18 at 5:45

It appears that you have hit a review ban - too many bad reviews (i.e. - rejected reviews).

This will expire in about an hour or so - be sure to review more carefully ;)

|improve this answer|||||
  • 21
    OH wow, that's weird. I hadn't even reviewed today, I suppose something lagged. It has been all day, and I didn't think my record was very bad. Do you know this as a FACT or is it a guess? (I mean have to literally checked my account) - Thanks – mayersdesign Apr 7 '17 at 14:18
  • 5
    I know this as a fact - I took a look (I am a developer, so have access). It is entirely possible that the review rejections happened well after you have reviewed, the ban would only go into effect at that point. – Oded Apr 7 '17 at 14:20
  • 2
    OK. Oh well, I will wait it out. Thanks for your response. Thanks twice if you lift the ban! haha. It is Friday, and my record really isn't bad! (Well I don't think so) ;) – mayersdesign Apr 7 '17 at 14:21
  • @mayersdesign did you not notice the banner about failing an audit and which one it was a couple of days ago? :-/ – Jon Clements Apr 7 '17 at 16:08
  • 2
    @Jon Clements Yes I saw that, it was a tough audit (imho) I got confused with the markup change on a documentation edit. I was banned for 24 hours, but that disappeared and was replaced by this. Before it had a countdown of sorts, but this new message has nothing like that. – mayersdesign Apr 7 '17 at 16:10
  • Incidentally it just came back and it looks different - literally different styling, so I suppose it was being updated (the queue button) – mayersdesign Apr 7 '17 at 16:11
  • 16
    I think it would be really good if it had an explanation for how long the user is banned to review posts. – Red fx Nov 15 '17 at 14:15
  • 20
    If you navigate to: stackoverflow.com/review it say (in my case): Your review on https://stackoverflow.com/review/low-quality-posts/XXX and https://stackoverflow.com/review/low-quality-posts/XXX wasn't helpful. Please do not edit non-answers. Come back on Oct 19 at 4:12 to continue reviewing. – Ferrrmolina Sep 20 '18 at 1:22
  • 1
    Oded's first comment implies this is not (only) the cause of failed audits. Jon Clements talks about failing an audit, not multiple. – Glorfindel Nov 8 '18 at 22:18
  • Its been a three days but not yet updated – Ashish Kamble Oct 22 '19 at 5:05
  • 3
    The review system banning is seriously broken. I got banned based on a bad triage. However, three other persons made the same call (requires editing), so it wasn't that bad warranting a ban. Is that how you encourage people to do triaging? – Jari Turkia Mar 3 at 7:08
  • 1
    The message must include a link to stackoverflow.com/review . Without it the reviewer doesn't have any info and can't improve. – ofirule Mar 21 at 18:52

You had too many bad / rejected reviews. This oftentimes is the result of failing the one's Stackoverflow places in the review queues to test your attention.

To see when your ban will be lifted visit the Review Overview page.

|improve this answer|||||
  • 4
    This answer doesn't add anything new to the other answers. – Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog Nov 8 '18 at 21:56
  • 4
    The correct answer is partially wrong. – Tiago Martins Peres 李大仁 Nov 8 '18 at 22:04
  • 6
    @SonictheAnonymousHedgehog this is the first answer to mention going to the review overview homepage. – Pika the Wizard of the Whales Nov 9 '18 at 4:39
  • What is a "bad" review? – Martin Argerami Jan 24 '19 at 23:27
  • 1
    A rejected / about to be rejected review. – Tiago Martins Peres 李大仁 Jan 25 '19 at 3:04
  • 4
    Thanks for the Review Overview link, from which I find out I did somehow carelessly accepted one unintentional slightly harmful bad edit. – Tiw Feb 3 '19 at 12:40
  • 6
    I was rejected for 8 days for placing a "Requires Editing" on one post rather than closing. The funny thing is the other two reviewers also used "Requires Editing". Guess we are all banned. Seems if 3 do the same review on the same post, then SO needs to do something better on their end. – Marcy Jan 23 at 19:09
  • @Marcy was that the first mistake of you've done more before? – Tiago Martins Peres 李大仁 Jan 23 at 19:12
  • @TiagoMartinsPeres, I'm not sure. I only recall being told once but have had several "good" notifications. – Marcy Jan 23 at 19:25
  • Oh yes, that's why. It happens, no big deal, just try to be a little more careful. If you think it's a case worth mentioning, then go to Meta and ask a question about it. Most likely there's already such case if you dig well enough... – Tiago Martins Peres 李大仁 Jan 23 at 19:45

I discovered this week that there is one more situation where this happens: if you exhaust your daily vote limit. As soon as you do this, the review queues close, at least the basic ones that are available to lower-reputation users. I suspect this is the case because one of the preferred tasks you can perform in most review queues is to upvote or downvote posts.

|improve this answer|||||
  • 7
    To ensure if it is because of this or because of bad reviews, you can just head to the stack reviews page , and it will show what happened! – M.K Feb 15 '19 at 8:49

The advice in the accepted answer ("review more carefully") is not actionable.

To uncover something actionable I went to the review page as referenced in many comments here. That page showed one bad edit, not many, and that the ban was for four days, not one hour.

When I looked into it a little more more I found that on that review I and one other reviewer had said "Looks OK", but three others said "Requires Editing".

Actionable advice: err on the side of enforcing high-quality posts, which is what all the guidance says. In my particular case I'll be more inclined to vote "Requires Editing", which I now realize I haven't used very often.

|improve this answer|||||

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .