The Reputation history of my Super User account is showing a lower upper limit on the graph compared to my current reputation. I think this is wrong, is it?

  • What, exactly, is wrong about it? What would be correct data?
    – John Rudy
    Nov 12, 2009 at 19:21
  • i have reputation is more than 5k but its show graph below than 5k
    – joe
    Nov 12, 2009 at 19:22
  • The graph does not calculate rep 100% exactly the same way the system itself does. It calculates based on Q & A scores, and while it's usually fairly accurate, in some cases, it can appear low. For many users whose reps are 1, for example, it will appear negative because their initial acts on the site may be getting downvoted. See also meta.stackexchange.com/questions/25405/…
    – John Rudy
    Nov 12, 2009 at 19:39
  • 2
    Also, is it possible that some of your rep came from questions or answers which may have since been deleted? (If a recalc is done, you will lose that rep.) See also meta.stackexchange.com/questions/23531/…
    – John Rudy
    Nov 12, 2009 at 19:41
  • Dupe? meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1543/…
    – Troggy
    Nov 12, 2009 at 19:55
  • I recalculated your rep on SU. It didn't change much.. Jun 19, 2010 at 20:53
  • This is a dupe of so many questions, just look at the "Related" list to the right.
    – ЯegDwight
    Sep 16, 2010 at 22:37

2 Answers 2


It's probably off by 100 - the amount you get for associating your accounts.

If you look at my Server Fault profile you'll see that the graph stops at just over 600 (as of this writing) while my rep is 731.

The discrepancy is the 100 point bonus I got for associating my accounts.


Flag one of your own posts for a moderator, and ask for a recalc.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .