I recently suggested an edit on Stack Overflow. Incidentally, an edit to a question I answered and which has been upvoted and chose as the correct one by the OP.
Since the title is actually not rightly related with what is really asked, I wanted to make it be fully representative. The edit has been rejected.
I wanted to contest it. Which is not possible for comprehensible reasons.
To have an idea of the legitimation of the rejection, I visited each reviewer's profile. And actually, one reviewer has accepted it.
Note that among the four reviewers, he is the one with the highest reputation (I admit nonetheless that this is not an objective signal of reviewing quality), but he is the only one who has relevant top tags regarding my edit.
Why are edit reviews not assigned considering reviewers' top-tags ? Or at least non-uniformly weigthed if one of the reviewers has relevant top-tags ?
I read that there is no reviews assigment process, is this voluntary ?