17

The way Stack Exchange cross-links sites via "Hot Network Questions" is causing Google search results to be pretty useless... so I'd like to request that "Hot Network Questions" be removed from all sites or some other change be executed to help Google post more relative results.

Case in point:

The pages that are not part of the "ExpressionEngine" Stack Exchange site show up in my search results because, I assume, they link to the ExpressionEngine Stack Exchange site in their "Hot Network Questions" section in the right column.

Screenshot of the section:

My Google search string was the following if you want to test the results on your end:

"Maximum function nesting level" "expressionengine" 
  • 1
    If you're trying to find results for the ExpressionEngine site, you should use the advanced search operator site:expressionengine.stackexchange.com, like this. – Laurel Dec 5 '17 at 0:42
  • Why do you assume HNQ has anything to do with it, rather than the fact that the results actually contain the string you searched for? – Cai Dec 5 '17 at 0:55
  • @Laurel Though this is an option, this isn't realistic with the amount that I search. I also don't just want Google search results from SE... but I want valid search results from SE when they do show. – Anna_MediaGirl Dec 14 '17 at 17:57
  • 1
    @Cai This isn't an assumption. These CMSs are not related to each other and one wouldn't find "expressionengine" related content on the Joomla or Drupal sites. The crosslinking is polluting the search results. I've used Google as my main search method for years now and the results coming from SE have become less and less relevant when searching exact terms specific to the CMSs I work with. – Anna_MediaGirl Dec 14 '17 at 18:04
  • 1
    @Anna it is an assumption, you don’t know Google’s algorithm. My point is that all of those results literally contain your search string. You’re searching for a generic PHP error that shows up in all of those CMSs. The search results you show look perfectly normal to me. – Cai Dec 14 '17 at 18:09
  • @cai I am searching also for ""expressionengine" which is not a term that shows on those pages except via the cross-linking. I can't think of any other way Google would be connecting the two exact search terms together with those CMS page results... can you? – Anna_MediaGirl Dec 14 '17 at 19:52
  • I really don't know, but links between to those sites doesn't seem like an obvious assumption. Remember those sites are all on the same domain so Google, AFAIK, will treat those as internal links and give them nowhere near as much weight as regular backlinks. – Cai Dec 14 '17 at 20:27
  • also worth noting that if you replace "expressionengine" in your search with "wordpress" or "drupal" you get more accurate results, so I'd assume there are simply less ranking results that relate to ExpressionEngine – Cai Dec 14 '17 at 20:29
  • @cai I would agree that internal vs external links have different weights... but internal links still have weight and if there is an internal cross-link, why wouldn't that generate incorrect results? – Anna_MediaGirl Dec 15 '17 at 0:06
  • I'm reaching this conclusion because my Google search is looking for exact matches of both terms... they are wrapped in quotes. So technically both terms "should" be present on the page, right? I'd argue that when Google crawled the site, the two terms were on the same page because of the crosslinking. – Anna_MediaGirl Dec 15 '17 at 0:11
7

I can prove this is an issue:

Hot Network Question titles are indexed and then show up in google searches, causing SE to pollute the results... in this example, 8/9 results on the first page are various SE sites and only one of them has anything to do with the quoted text; the rest only include the title in HNQ. This is particularly clear when you see the surrounding text in the quote, which is just other HNQ titles.

Google search that is just a page of random stack exchange websites: sci-fi (the one that relates to the term) as well as german, crypto and stackoverflow

Seems like it would be prudent to remove HNQ for search spiders.

Also worth mentioning is the only non-SE result is cloning content from the HNQ on SE.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .