I'm with the majority (according to Meta) in believing noise removal is beneficial
Focus on suggesting substantial improvements until you have gained your 2k rep. By doing this you are making the reviewers time investment worthwhile.
If you read the help page for the edit privilege it says:
When should I edit posts?
Any time you feel you can make the post better, and are inclined to do
so. Editing is encouraged!
Some common reasons to edit are:
- to fix grammatical or spelling mistakes
- to clarify the meaning of a post without changing it
- to correct minor mistakes or add addendums / updates as the post ages
- to add related resources or hyperlinks
Tiny, trivial edits are discouraged - try to make the post significantly better when you edit, correcting all problems that you
observe.
(emphasis mine)
I've had small edits like this on Super User approved
If I was reviewing that particular edit I would have have picked the improve edit option as there are still some issues with that particular post.
For example:
- "kaspersky" should start with a capital letter
- "to see it was no on those either." does not make sense. The "no" should have been "not"
- There is a lot of superfluous text that could have been removed, like, for example, "It stirred me into a panic"
Note: I'm a moderator on SuperUser, but I no longer regularly perform reviews as my votes are binding and I want to let the community votes be heard.