-20

In relation to your post on your New Code of Conduct...

We'd like your feedback on our new Code of Conduct!

...I just experienced five immediate downvotes on my initial post today by moderators without any chance to correct, update or do anything at all about it before - probably those five - downvoted my reputation for no reason at all!

How to console output only one dimension in a 2D array C#

I am sick of this type of behavior. When will someone who is on top of the food chain in SO finally rein these moderators in and give them a warning for these actions? It's just impertinent, having to put up with this time after time after time.

If you really are serious about your New Code of Conduct, then change the attitude of hostility of these people, which they show without hesitation, thought nor restraint in a consistent and constant manner towards people, who just come to SO with the intent to ask questions which generate knowledge as to benefit all.

THIS is what is wrong with SO. Nothing else!

  • 14
    A common misconception is that downvotes = hostility. When in reality, downvotes = bad question/answer or low quality and in need of improvement. A downvote is like getting an answer wrong on a test. The teacher then circles the answer and deducts points from your grade. It's really nothing more than that. If you find that you get downvoted a lot, that's an indication that you should start improving them. If you start failing test after test in school, it's an indication that you should try to improve. – Mysticial Jul 18 '18 at 23:49
  • 1
    "downvoted for no reason at all" - You cannot be sure about that. It might be better to ask how the question can be improved. – Modus Tollens Jul 19 '18 at 0:04
  • 4
    By moderators? How do you know who voted? – Monica Cellio Jul 19 '18 at 0:14
  • 3
    There were five people who voted to put the question on hold. They were not moderators but had the close vote privilege. And they may well not have downvoted at all. – Jason Bassford Jul 19 '18 at 0:38
  • 10
    @raddevus: "Interesting assumption that down-voter is always more right than the actual question writer." Well, 9 times out of 10, they are. And the more downvotes that get attracted, the more likely it is that they are right. "Consider how easy it is to downvote something in relation to actually writing a question." The primary reason questions receive downvotes is because the asker didn't put in much actual effort. Consider the OP's question; he basically asked how to write a single for loop rather than a nested one. – Nicol Bolas Jul 19 '18 at 1:43
  • 5
    You need to appreciate that nobody's obliged to help you with that problem. People do it as a volunteering activity. The question you asked seems extremely elementary considering your knowledge of 2D arrays, so it's only reasonable that they found your question strange. Remember that they have answered questions well to gain that reputation and prove their awareness of SO and SE, while you have not. That's not saying that you aren't aware, but it's important proof that they probably know what they're doing. Don't get annoyed with them, they're not obliged to help. And be nice, or they won't. – user392547 Jul 19 '18 at 2:38
  • 2
    Writing a question can be quite easy - copy/paste some code, compose a title and add a sentence of explanation and question. To analyse a question and decide to vote on it is not trivial, and understanding some questions can take a considerable effort. Your C# question shows code for two loops to index both dimensions of a 2D array. It's not unresonable to expect a programmer to realize that one row/column can be iterated by eliminating one loop and keeping the index for that dimension constant. – Martin James Jul 19 '18 at 2:42
  • 2
    I mean, if you understand 2D indexing, it's, well, you are asking for a simpler operation. It's like 'I can plough a whole field just fine, but how can I dig just one furrow 50 metres in?' - you just drive the plough down the field once, staying always 50 metres from the hedge. – Martin James Jul 19 '18 at 2:52
  • 13
    'I am sick of this type of behavior' oh, believe me, so am I. This continual slamming of SO curators in this manner is disgraceful. It's grossly insulting to accuse user-moderators of consistent and constant unrestrained hostility on the grounds that you posted a question that other users decided was not useful/researched:( – Martin James Jul 19 '18 at 3:03
  • 5
    @raddevus: "Where's the data for your belief?" 9 times out of 10, people who use the phrase "9 times out of 10" are merely using a phrase that means "the vast majority of the time" rather than using hard numbers. My "data" for this is merely my years spent on this site. "There is a band-wagon effect that can (and often does) occur also." Where's your data for that? Nobody ever thinks they've asked a bad question, so you cannot reasonably evaluate your own questions. Where are you seeing people voting purely due to a bandwagon, rather than because the question merits the voting? – Nicol Bolas Jul 19 '18 at 5:01
  • 1
    @NicolBolas SO should issue free mirrors to new accounts so that they can assign blame for downvotes etc. where it usually belongs:( – Martin James Jul 19 '18 at 9:12
  • 1
    @raddevus in that case, you should have no trouble in linking, say, 10 of the 1.7 million improperly-downvoted questions.... – Martin James Jul 19 '18 at 13:15
  • 1
    @raddevus Considering I see no recent downvotes on your account on SO...I'm having trouble seeing your issue. You ask for data, but provide none of your own. Where's your data that trolls abound on SO? Hint: pointing at downvotes isn't evidence, because it's not trolling. It's engaging in quality curation. – fbueckert Jul 19 '18 at 13:33
  • 1
    I can see that my initial point, written in my original post, has been over and over proven correct in the majority of comments on the very same. The prevailing attitude that can be read from those comments is overly what - is - wrong - with stackoverfow. It's full of navel-gazing divas and princesses that think everyone is there for them, not the other way around. 'And be nice, or they won't'??? If I am helping someone voluntarily, I do so or I don't. Don't want to help? Think it's cumbersome? Leave! Don't complain. All of you have started somewhere and I think that those comments just... – themightyhulk Jul 23 '18 at 16:48
  • 1
    ...illustrate the juvenile behavior of some people who are socially inept and dysfunctional. Now this is not new amongst the programming community, where you can find all sorts of diagnoses, ranging from ADHD, Autism and to Aspbergers and Anxiety. I don't have an issue with that, but I do have an issue when that lack of social skill is impairing the ability to nonverbally communicate in a forum that was designed to do just - that. I don't think the majority of commenters in this thread has read what was writting in the first link posted by the people who started this community. It was small... – themightyhulk Jul 23 '18 at 16:51
18

who just come to SO with the intent to ask questions which generate knowledge as to benefit all.

Our purpose is to generate useful knowledge for all, yes. But consider the quality of your question.

You showed off a 2D array, where you loop over each element of that array with two for loops, with each loop accessing a particular dimension of the array. You then asked us to explain how to loop over a single dimension of the array.

... I know that I've been programming for 30+ years, so I'm coming at this with a vast wealth of knowledge and experience at the task. But I genuinely cannot fathom how one can write 2D iteration over a 2D array, but be unable to convert it into 1D iteration. Even if you only got that code through copy-and-pasting from some tutorial, I don't understand how you can be unable to just play around with it and work it out on your own.

Asking on Stack Overflow is not meant to be the first recourse when you encounter a problem. You come here to ask when you have made a good faith effort to resolve that problem on your own. Whether that's looking in a debugger, just playing around with code, doing some Googling on how loops/arrays work, or whatever.

Can you truthfully say that you made a good faith effort to solve the problem on your own?

I would say that your question can not "generate knowledge as to benefit all"; it only benefits yourself, the person who is in this particular position. That is, most people who don't know how to iterate over a single dimension of a 2D array probably also don't know how to iterate over both dimensions of a 2D array. So your question won't help them.

It only helps yourself.

That, coupled with the fact that you probably could have worked it out for yourself if you took a little time to do so, shows that this is a low-effort question. That makes it worthy of downvoting.

Voting is not about you; it's about your post. Good content gets upvotes. Bad content gets downvotes. The vote total is about telling other people "this is good content; check it out" or "this is bad content; don't bother unless you like wasting time". They are a sign of a post's quality, which is of interest to other people.

People aren't downvoting your posts to harm you; they're downvoting them to tell others the quality of the content you provided.

This is not about being welcoming to a person; this is about being welcoming to bad questions. The former is fine; the latter is not.

  • 4
    Note to the person who thought it was a good idea to write a novel in the comments here: it wasn't. – Shog9 Jul 24 '18 at 20:22
  • Did you ever find a strongly downvoted good post? – peterh Jul 25 '18 at 1:43
  • 1
    @peterh: I don't recall running across one. But even if I had, that wouldn't change anything. One out of tens of thousands is a rounding error. – Nicol Bolas Jul 25 '18 at 2:50
  • @NicolBolas Not even on the metas? – peterh Jul 25 '18 at 3:17
6

Hi @themightyhulk! I'm sorry you are having a hard time on this site. I understand what you feel, I've been there too but there's things you need to understand.

People aren't downvoting your question because they don't like you or because they aren't nice, they are simply doing it because they think your question is unclear and should be improved. Don't take downvotes as insults, they aren't at all!

Most downvoters will also give you a comment when downvoting your question. Their comments will contain useful tips on how to improve your question! Read them carefully and you find very good information! I know it can be hard to take criticism at times when you may already be desperate to solve your problem. It might be a good idea to take a time to cool down to think rationnally.

No one should feel ashamed of asking questions that gets downvoted. (Everyone are bad askers before being good askers). Asking good questions is a skill that is valuable and not only on SO. Transforming your thoughs into a clear question takes efforts but do it properly and you won't regret it, I promise!

  • 2
    In this case, since it was close votes, you can change the "most of the time there's a comment" to "there is a description given". But this is a good, positively written answer. – user392547 Jul 19 '18 at 2:40
  • @Winter Thanks for your constructive answer. I already posted my response to the majority of comments to my initial post under it. So you can read my stance on this there. I appreciate your kind attitude and attempt of explaining your take on this, but I have to disagree with you on that topic. The point here is, that the better part of the SO supporters - if we should call them that - are having a narcissistic attitude and are clearly showing that others should be catering to their needs and wants, rather than acknowledging some facts. For one, the question was answered and the problem thus.. – themightyhulk Jul 23 '18 at 17:26
  • ...solved. This is how things whould be working. For the other, I got a post about Big Data, which I clearly remember being downvoted for the same reasons and attitude. Throughout time, said post has been repeatedly upvoted and garnered thousands of views. By users - just - like - me - who found it absolutely useful. This is not about being 'not able to take some criticism by me - the user who needs help. The issue of not being able to take criticism lies with the people, exhibiting the toxic, self-absorbed behavior! People who started out like anybody else, knowing nothin! The grotesque... – themightyhulk Jul 23 '18 at 17:34
  • ...part about this all is, that one can draw a direct line between the SO post on what is discussed as the New Code of Conduct by the individuals who started this community and to the above comments. The ones who provide the best support and answers are the ones that know this and are acting to be kind, helpful and supportive in a swift, uncomplicated and effective manner. The ones that need their egos polished are the ones that you hear immediate and most complains about. This is wrong, that is poor, you didn't try, you did this and that and on and on and on it goes. People with poor social.. – themightyhulk Jul 23 '18 at 17:37
  • ...skills, but possibly good programming skills. I for my part would rather be without their help and accept help from the minority on SO which do help. In my older posts there are numerous commenters who, without criticism, narcissism or hostility are helping straight away, throwing in interesting new angles, thoughts and ideas which usually end up, providing great help. Unfortunately, they are in the minority as mentioned before and this is what SO's reputation suffers from in the latest years. I am not alone in my criticism and sick of this behavior. Just to give you solid prove that... – themightyhulk Jul 23 '18 at 17:41
  • ...other are too here goes... hackernoon.com/the-decline-of-stack-overflow-7cb69faa575d I have helped numerous people throughout time with IT related issues as well as programming and I never - ever - have been acting this infantile as what can be seen from the above posts. Just look at the comments and the attitude. 'He copied this', 'he didn't make an effort', he this, he that etc. etc. etc. It's head-spinning to say it nicely. Egos, as big as the Mt. Everest. Also, downvotes are not always aimed at 'improving the quality of the question' as some here claim. Downvotes are often a... – themightyhulk Jul 23 '18 at 17:45
  • ...way of personally diminishing the rep of a user. There are numerous stories on this topic you can google saying, that many present supporters and moderators are trying to accumulate as much reputation as possible in order to be using their accounts as references when searching for better jobs. At the same time, they're downvoting others in order to protect their reputation so their position can't be touched nor threatened by other users. Downvotes therefore mean, my reputation and possibilities to comment, upvote and participate on an equal level are constantly sabotaged. So it means a lot! – themightyhulk Jul 23 '18 at 17:50

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .