The criterion are:
- most of the work is from a source that is not made by the OP (the original thread)
- the substance of the source (and the crux of the question) rely heavily on information from another source
- You are citing a source.
Some or all of these may be incorrect, hence I am asking for clarification and to allow my post to be more on topic than it currently is.
Here is my post:
(to be edited in here shortly) how to deal with a loot hungry player
I am not sure if I correctly or incorrectly made this a wiki post (mine is one of the answers) Could a pop up box not appear to make clear what is suitable for a good wiki post and what is not suitable for a good wiki post?
I am not the only one: prior post about confusing role of community wiki pages